tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 vs Falken FK510 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 41 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiMaxContact MC6 72, FK510 SUV 71.

Check price on Amazon · ContiMaxContact MC6 Check price on Amazon · FK510 SUV
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK510 SUV
Tire BFalken

FK510 SUV

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    FK510 SUV +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 72 (est.)82
    Reviews found online7765

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 73

    Wet

    FK510 SUV +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 72 (est.)81
    Reviews found online7372

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 73

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 80.7 + 40% × 71.6 = 77

    No road tests of wet for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Comfort

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 69 (est.)61
    Reviews found online7060

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.9 = 69

    FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.3 + 60% × 60.4 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–74
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 64

    Treadwear

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +4
    60
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6355

    ContiMaxContact MC6: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 62.9 = 64

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 55.4 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiMaxContact MC6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 79

    Handling (owners)

    ContiMaxContact MC6 +12
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6FK510 SUV
    Reviews found online7967
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    44
    Why this score
    SourceContiMaxContact MC6FK510 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests–44
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiMaxContact MC6Falken FK510 SUV
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 74 75
Wet 73 77
Comfort 69 61
Noise – 71
Treadwear 64 60
Handling (owners) 79 67
Efficiency – 44

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiMaxContact MC6

± 6

FK510 SUV

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiMaxContact MC6

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet traction with high cornering confidence
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
  • Direct and responsive steering feedback

Cons

  • Mixed reports on tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls susceptible to damage from curb impacts
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users finding them loud on rough tarmac
All owner themes in the ContiMaxContact MC6 review

Tire B FK510 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
  • Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
  • Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
All owner themes in the FK510 SUV review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 B · Falken FK510 SUV
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available348
Rim diameters19″ – 21″17″ – 22″
Sizes in common22

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6

Falken FK510 SUV

Too close to call: Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 and Falken FK510 SUV are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 is stronger on handling, comfort and treadwear. Falken FK510 SUV is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 79 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6 scores 64 vs 60 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken FK510 SUV scores 77 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiMaxContact MC6
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken FK510 SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiMaxContact MC6 or FK510 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, ContiMaxContact MC6 or FK510 SUV?

Falken FK510 SUV, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiMaxContact MC6 or FK510 SUV?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiMaxContact MC6 or FK510 SUV?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiMaxContact MC6 or FK510 SUV?

Continental ContiMaxContact MC6, 64 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology