Head-to-head Updated

Falken FK510 SUV vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 4 road tests and 9 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

Ultrac Vorti+ leads, 73–71 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK510 SUV
Tire AFalken

FK510 SUV

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

Ultrac Vorti+

Summer

± 6

Tests 76 · 4 tests Owners 70 · 60 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    Level
    75
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVUltrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests8275
    Reviews found online6675

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 82 + 40% × 65.6 = 75

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 75.1 + 40% × 74.5 = 75

  2. 77

    Wet

    Ultrac Vorti+ +1
    78
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVUltrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 4 tests8180
    Reviews found online7274

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 71.8 = 77

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 80.2 + 40% × 73.6 = 78

  3. 61

    Comfort

    Ultrac Vorti+ +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVUltrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6163

    FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.5 + 60% × 61 = 61

    Ultrac Vorti+: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 62.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Ultrac Vorti+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. 71

    Noise

    FK510 SUV +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVUltrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests7467
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 67.4 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV or Ultrac Vorti+. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 59

    Treadwear

    Ultrac Vorti+ +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVUltrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5564

    FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59

    Ultrac Vorti+: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Vorti+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Ultrac Vorti+ +8
    76
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVUltrac Vorti+
    Reviews found online6876
  7. 44

    Efficiency

    FK510 SUV +8
    36
    Why this score
    SourceFK510 SUVUltrac Vorti+
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 3 tests4436
Scores at a glance
Falken FK510 SUV vs Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken FK510 SUVVredestein Ultrac Vorti+
Relative Score 71 73
Dry 75 75
Wet 77 78
Comfort 61 65
Noise 71 67
Treadwear 59 65
Handling (owners) 68 76
Efficiency 44 36

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

FK510 SUV

± 6

Ultrac Vorti+

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryFK510 SUVUltrac Vorti+ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 94% #8/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #8/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 91% #4/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test 97% #5/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 96% #6/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 96% #2/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 92% #8/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test 95% #8/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 95% #9/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 98% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #6/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 76% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 81% #10/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 74% #7/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 69% #3/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Grass Traction Off-road 92% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 75% #8/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Gravel Handling Off-road 100% #2/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 97% #10/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Gravel Traction Off-road 95% #3/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 87% #11/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Mud Traction Off-road 74% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 98% #2/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Sand Traction Off-road 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test 84% #6/11 · 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #3/10 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test #9/11 2024 Summer SUV Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A FK510 SUV

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
  • Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback

Cons

  • Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
  • Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
  • Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
All owner themes in the FK510 SUV review

Tire B Ultrac Vorti+

Pros

  • Significantly better ride comfort and reduced road noise compared to run-flat tires
  • Excellent wet handling and dependable traction in heavy rain
  • Balanced dry grip and improved steering response

Cons

  • Subpar grip performance in snow and winter conditions
  • Potentially quicker rear tread wear under aggressive driving
  • Slightly reduced cornering grip compared to specialized rain-oriented tires
All owner themes in the Ultrac Vorti+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken FK510 SUV B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4865
Rim diameters17″ – 22″18″ – 22″
Sizes in common1919

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken FK510 SUV

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

Narrow edge: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Falken FK510 SUV if efficiency and noise matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want lower fuel or energy use

Falken FK510 SUV scores 44 vs 36 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ scores 76 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+ scores 65 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Falken FK510 SUV scores 71 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Falken FK510 SUV
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

FK510 SUV or Ultrac Vorti+?

Which is better in the wet, FK510 SUV or Ultrac Vorti+?

Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, FK510 SUV or Ultrac Vorti+?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, FK510 SUV or Ultrac Vorti+?

Falken FK510 SUV, 71 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, FK510 SUV or Ultrac Vorti+?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, FK510 SUV or Ultrac Vorti+?

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti+, 65 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, FK510 SUV or Ultrac Vorti+?

Falken FK510 SUV, 44 vs 36 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology