Tests 78 · 3 tests Owners 64 · 9 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken FK510 SUV vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 3 + 13 road tests and 9 + 2,504 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 4 leads, 75–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 13 tests Owners 71 · 2,504 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Ventus Prime 4 +580Why this score
Source FK510 SUV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 11 tests 82 84 Reviews found online 66 73 FK510 SUV: 60% × 82 + 40% × 65.6 = 75
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 84.2 + 40% × 73.4 = 80
-
77
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +178Why this score
Source FK510 SUV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 12 tests 81 81 Reviews found online 72 75 FK510 SUV: 60% × 81 + 40% × 71.8 = 77
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 80.5 + 40% × 74.6 = 78
-
61
Comfort
Ventus Prime 4 +869Why this score
Source FK510 SUV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 62 70 Reviews found online 61 68 FK510 SUV: 40% × 61.5 + 60% × 61 = 61
Ventus Prime 4: 40% × 70.3 + 60% × 67.8 = 69
-
71
Noise
FK510 SUV +1061Why this score
Source FK510 SUV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 8 tests 74 58 Reviews found online ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) FK510 SUV: 60% × 74.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 61
No owner ratings of noise for FK510 SUV or Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
59
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +1574Why this score
Source FK510 SUV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 55 67 FK510 SUV: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 59
Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 78.2 + 40% × 66.7 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for FK510 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
68
Handling (owners)
Ventus Prime 4 +472Why this score
Source FK510 SUV Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 68 72 -
44
Efficiency
Ventus Prime 4 +3983Why this score
Source FK510 SUV Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / 8 tests 44 83
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken FK510 SUV | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 75 |
| Dry | 75 | 80 |
| Wet | 77 | 78 |
| Comfort | 61 | 69 |
| Noise | 71 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 72 |
| Efficiency | 44 | 83 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
FK510 SUV
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | FK510 SUV | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 92% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 99% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 100% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 90% #4/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Curved Aquaplaning | Wet | 91% #4/8 · 2021 Camper Van / SUV Tyre Test | 93% #6/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 96% #6/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 91% #16/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 87% #14/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 100% #1/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 67% #4/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 90% #4/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 67% #6/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 99% #4/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 100% #2/8 · 2020 Gute Fahrt SUV Summer Tyre Test | 80% #11/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 76% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 95% #10/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 74% #7/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 69% #9/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 92% #9/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 83% #8/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 74% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 86% #8/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | – | Different tests |
| Sand Traction | Off-road | 100% #1/10 · 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | 93% #5/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/10 2022 AutoBild SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | #11/16 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A FK510 SUV
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to top-tier premium brands
- Quiet, compliant, and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry and wet handling with good feedback
Cons
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear on certain vehicle setups
- Reduced fuel economy (MPG)
- Some users reported poor traction and slipping in wet or moisture conditions
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Falken FK510 SUV
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.
r/tires
·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09
“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
forums.hardwarezone.com.sg
·2024-11-12
“Ya. I read that review too. If I up the psi to 3, or 4 would result in hard and harsh bumps and much less comfy ride which I don't like. Therefore, I settle for 34 front and 32 back and started back to use Eco mode. I don't carry heavy loads and many pax in my car. I restricted it to 4 adult pax including myself as a driver, with or without loads at the boot.”
r/TyreReviews
·6 upvotes ·2024-03-16
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling
Based on 41 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken FK510 SUV | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | 48 | 66 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Falken FK510 SUV
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better efficiency, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Falken FK510 SUV if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want lower fuel or energy use
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 83 vs 44 on efficiency.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Falken FK510 SUV scores 71 vs 61 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.
Tire A · Falken FK510 SUV
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
FK510 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?
Which is better in the wet, FK510 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 77 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, FK510 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, FK510 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?
Falken FK510 SUV, 71 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, FK510 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, FK510 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 74 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
Which rolls more easily, FK510 SUV or Ventus Prime 4?
Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 83 vs 44 on our efficiency score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology