Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 211 reviews
“for the price, theyre pretty decent. theyre not the stickiest tires available, but theyre alright and imo, theyre pretty predictable when nearing their limits.”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 211 + 126 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus Prime 3 K125 is ahead, 78–64
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 211 reviews
“for the price, theyre pretty decent. theyre not the stickiest tires available, but theyre alright and imo, theyre pretty predictable when nearing their limits.”
Tests 77 · 14 tests Owners 75 · 126 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 53 in 2021 53 Summer Tyre Braking Test (dry braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | FK452 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests | ≈ 66 (est.) | 89 |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 79 |
FK452: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.1 = 65
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 88.6 + 40% × 78.8 = 85
No road tests of dry for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | FK452 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 81 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 77 |
FK452: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.2 = 67
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 81.4 + 40% × 76.9 = 80
No road tests of wet for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | FK452 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests | ≈ 67 (est.) | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 72 |
FK452: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.3 = 63
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 40% × 75 + 60% × 71.8 = 73
No road tests of comfort for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | FK452 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests | – | 79 |
| Reviews found online | – | ≈ 66 (est.) |
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 74
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 3 K125. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | FK452 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests | ≈ 63 (est.) | 61 |
| Reviews found online | 56 | 72 |
FK452: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.7 = 60
Ventus Prime 3 K125: 60% × 61 + 40% × 71.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for FK452. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | FK452 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 63 | 75 |
| Source | FK452 | Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests | – | 66 |
| Category | Falken FK452 | Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 78 |
| Dry | 65 | 85 |
| Wet | 67 | 80 |
| Comfort | 63 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 74 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 75 |
| Efficiency | – | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
FK452
Ventus Prime 3 K125
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Falken FK452 is generally favorable, with many drivers praising its balance of solid wet and dry grip, low road noise, and accessible pricing. While regarded as a dependable daily performance tire that also stretches well, notable drawbacks cited by owners include fast tread wear on sports cars, tendency to flat-spot when sitting, and degradation in grip and road noise as the tread gets low.
“summer tires. Currently run these. Not as good as the a046 advans as they seem to flex a bit more. A buddy who owns a VIP shop runs those tires on their cars because they can stretch them easily(i.e. softer sidewalls). With that said they are great daily tires with some good grip for what they are designed.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by sdg1871 Hankooks are usually cheaper from Tire Rack than from tire shops. Many members have and like the Falkens. I've been going to my tire guy for a long time now, and he always gives me $10.00 less per tire than the lowest price I can find on the net, including tirerack. This $10.00 less also includes roadforce balancing and an alignment. He gives me a good deal, thats for sure. I'll be sure to post my thoughts about them once I get them on.”
“I realize there are already a few threads regarding this question, but I'm purchasing a new set of Gram Lights 57F - 18 x 8.5 from therpmstore . com and I could use some help finding the right tires. I'm planning on getting a wider tire and going with 245/40/18. I'm sure someone will recommend otherwise, but I've narrowed down my choices to the Toyo Proxes T1R and the Falken FK452. With the shipping at around $40 to NJ, the best prices I've found are from EdgeRacing . com . Toyo Proxes T1R - $157 Falken FK452 - $135 It seems like just as many people like the Toyo's as the Falken's, so I'm thinking about saving the $88 and go with the Falken's, but I would appreciate some more opinions. And, if someone can find a better price for me, that would be great too. Thanks in advance.”
Based on 47 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Falken FK452 | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 60 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | 300 AA A | 240 - 500 A - AA A - B |
Falken FK452
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 — better dry, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 85 vs 65 on dry.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 80 vs 67 on wet.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 75 vs 63 on handling.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125 scores 73 vs 63 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 80 vs 67 on our wet score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 85 vs 65 on our dry score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 73 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Hankook Ventus Prime 3 K125, 65 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology