Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 3 reviews
Falken Landair A/T T110 vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Grabber A/TX is ahead, 69–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Grabber A/TX +968Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 54 69 -
56
Wet
Grabber A/TX +1874Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 52 75 -
–
Snow
No comparison69Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online – 68 -
63
Comfort
Grabber A/TX +366Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 57 63 -
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online – 62 -
63
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +669Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 61 72 -
53
Handling
Grabber A/TX +861Why this score
Source Landair A/T T110 Grabber A/TX Reviews found online 53 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken Landair A/T T110 | General Grabber A/TX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 69 |
| Dry | 59 | 68 |
| Wet | 56 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 69 |
| Comfort | 63 | 66 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 69 |
| Handling | 53 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Landair A/T T110
Grabber A/TX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Landair A/T T110
Pros
- Affordable budget-friendly pricing
- Reasonable and predictable performance in dry weather conditions
- Decent upgrade over older tires like the Bridgestone on older compact SUVs
Cons
- Poor wet-road traction and handling
- Twitchy and unstable feel during high-speed cornering
- Lack of confidence-inspiring safety in wet weather, leading some to consider early replacement
Tire B Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken Landair A/T T110
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
Based on 37 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken Landair A/T T110 | B · General Grabber A/TX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 12 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 16″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 14 - 17/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 640 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken Landair A/T T110
General Grabber A/TX
Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better wet, dry and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Grabber A/TX scores 74 vs 56 on wet.
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 59 on dry.
General Grabber A/TX scores 61 vs 53 on handling.
General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.