tirewheelguide

Falken SN828 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken SN828 vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 21 road tests and 9 + 1,241 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 73–52

Check price on Amazon · ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or SN828 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken SN828
Tire AFalken

SN828

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 45 · 9 reviews

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

± 4

Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,241 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +17
    74
    Why this score
    SourceSN828ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 61 (est.)79
    Reviews found online5267

    SN828: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.5 = 57

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.4 + 40% × 66.7 = 74

    No road tests of dry for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 52

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +27
    79
    Why this score
    SourceSN828ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 20 tests≈ 57 (est.)85
    Reviews found online4670

    SN828: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 52

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 79

    No road tests of wet for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Comfort

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +5
    62
    Why this score
    SourceSN828ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 66 (est.)60
    Reviews found online5163

    SN828: 40% × 65.8 (est.) + 60% × 51 = 57

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.5 + 60% × 62.7 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for SN828. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSN828ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–66
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 66

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 48

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +21
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSN828ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 56 (est.)73
    Reviews found online3763

    SN828: 60% × 56 (est.) + 40% × 37.1 = 48

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for SN828. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 38

    Handling (owners)

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +28
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSN828ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Reviews found online3866
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    32
    Why this score
    SourceSN828ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–32
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken SN828Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Relative Score 52 73
Dry 57 74
Wet 52 79
Comfort 57 62
Noise – 66
Treadwear 48 69
Handling (owners) 38 66
Efficiency – 32

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SN828

± 4

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SN828

Pros

  • High value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Strong dry weather traction
  • Comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Poor wet weather grip, including issues with wheel spin and braking
  • Inconsistent noise levels, with some users reporting excessive cabin drone
  • Subpar tread life and durability
All owner themes in the SN828 review

Tire B ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken SN828

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken SN828 B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—86
Rim diameters—14″ – 19″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken SN828

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken SN828 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 66 vs 38 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 52 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 69 vs 48 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 74 vs 57 on dry.

Tire A · Falken SN828
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SN828 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Which is better in the wet, SN828 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 52 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SN828 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 74 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SN828 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 62 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SN828 or ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 69 vs 48 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology