Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1,062 + 67 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: WildPeak A/T4W 78, Outpost APT 79.
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 84 · 1,062 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 30 in 2026 Tire Rack All Terrain Tyre Snow Test (snow handling (tester's mark))
“New Wildpeak A/T4Ws Added some Wildpeak AT4s in 275/60r20 on my stock suspension ‘24 STX. Replaced the chrome lugs with black Gorillas and added rear well liners. Looks so much better than the OEM Hankooks.”
Tests – · none yet Owners 85 · 67 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | WildPeak A/T4W | Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 76 | ≈ 76 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 89 |
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 87.1 = 80
Outpost APT: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 88.5 = 81
No road tests of dry for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | WildPeak A/T4W | Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 82 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 92 |
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 86.4 = 80
Outpost APT: 60% × 82.5 (est.) + 40% × 92.3 = 86
No road tests of wet for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | WildPeak A/T4W | Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 72 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 73 |
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 75.8 = 73
Outpost APT: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72
No road tests of snow for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | WildPeak A/T4W | Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 78 |
WildPeak A/T4W: 40% × 70.7 + 60% × 77.4 = 75
Outpost APT: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 78.3 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | WildPeak A/T4W | Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 72 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 77 | 69 |
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 77.4 = 74
Outpost APT: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67
No road tests of noise for Outpost APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | WildPeak A/T4W | Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 75 (est.) | ≈ 74 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 89 | 87 |
WildPeak A/T4W: 60% × 74.6 (est.) + 40% × 89 = 80
Outpost APT: 60% × 74 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for WildPeak A/T4W. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | WildPeak A/T4W | Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 75 | 81 |
| Category | Falken WildPeak A/T4W | Nokian Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 79 |
| Dry | 80 | 81 |
| Wet | 80 | 86 |
| Snow | 73 | 72 |
| Comfort | 75 | 75 |
| Noise | 74 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
WildPeak A/T4W
Outpost APT
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the Falken Wildpeak A/T4W is largely positive, with owners praising its aggressive aesthetics, quiet highway ride, and reliable traction in wet and snowy conditions. Most discussions focus on fitment clearance and upsized setups, with very little to no rubbing reported across multiple platforms. The primary critique and discussion point centers on its noticeable tire weight, associated MPG penalties, and confusing load-rating weight discrepancies.
“New Shoe Sunday Wildpeak A/T4W Don’t notice the extra weight. No noise, drives about the same as my duelers. No rubbing: 275/65/18. I have a 2” lift and I preemptively switch to flush mount screws when I trimmed my bumper. I was a little disappointed as I expected them to fill the wheel well a little more. I think of lot of that is the factory wheel and then being 18”s but I have many more places I would rather spend the money. I am however very excited to see how they handle on the trail soon. I feel more peace of most that I won’t shred a tire on the rocks though. Ps. If anyone wants a set of duelers with less than 2k miles in selling cheap. Leer más”
“Falken Wildpeak A/T4W I’ve been running a set of Kenda Klever R/T 35s on my Jeep and they’ve been great for a while. They got us through our Ouray and Moab adventures without a single issue, and I originally picked them up for a steal at 180 a tire. However, over the last few months, I started dealing with a nasty front-end wobble around 40 mph. It got so bad that the truck was becoming unbearable to drive. I was honestly ready to drop a ton of money on new ball joints, drag links, and tie rods because I assumed the hardware had just worn out. When I took the truck into Discount Tire for a rotation, I asked them to try a rebalance as well. The tech came back and told me the tires were a total pain to balance. That’s when it clicked that the Klevers might have gone out of round. Since they were already pretty worn down, I decided to just have them order and install a set of Falken Wildpeak A/T4W tires in 35 x 11.5 instead. The difference has been night and day. The truck finally drives smooth again, the wobble is completely gone, and the ATs made the ride so much quieter. They look great on the truck as well. Tires being out of round was the last thing I was thinking about. But I do remember on some forums that others with Klevers did have that problem as well.”
“Wildpeak A/T4W C vs E load same weight? Shopping new tires for my rig. Discount Tire and Falken’s spec sheet both state the C load and E load in the same size are the same weight. How is this possible? I’m probably going C anyways but I was just surprised and thought this must be a misprint? Read more”
Based on 41 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Falken WildPeak A/T4W | B · Nokian Outpost APT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 64 | 37 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | 13/32″ |
| UTQG | 660 B B | 700 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 47 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 10 | 10 |
Falken WildPeak A/T4W
Nokian Outpost APT
Too close to call: Falken WildPeak A/T4W and Nokian Outpost APT are within 2 points overall. Falken WildPeak A/T4W is stronger on noise. Nokian Outpost APT is stronger on wet and handling.
Falken WildPeak A/T4W scores 74 vs 67 on noise.
Nokian Outpost APT scores 86 vs 80 on wet.
Nokian Outpost APT scores 81 vs 75 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Nokian Outpost APT, 86 vs 80 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 81 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Falken WildPeak A/T4W, 74 vs 67 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 79 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
