tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro vs Nokian Outpost APT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 22 + 67 owner reviews. How we score

Outpost APT leads, 79–76 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Outpost APT or Patagonia A/T Pro on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nokian Outpost APT
Tire BNokian

Outpost APT

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 85 · 67 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Outpost APT +5
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online8089

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76

    Outpost APT: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 88.6 = 81

    No road tests of dry for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    Outpost APT +6
    86
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 82 (est.)
    Reviews found online8492

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 77.7 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80

    Outpost APT: 60% × 82.5 (est.) + 40% × 92.3 = 86

    No road tests of wet for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 74

    Snow

    Patagonia A/T Pro +2
    72
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7773

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 76.8 = 74

    Outpost APT: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72

    No road tests of snow for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    Patagonia A/T Pro +1
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8079

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76

    Outpost APT: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 78.6 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6868

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67

    Outpost APT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    Outpost APT +3
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost APT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8187

    Patagonia A/T Pro: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 76

    Outpost APT: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 87.3 = 79

    No road tests of treadwear for Patagonia A/T Pro. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Outpost APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Outpost APT +3
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePatagonia A/T ProOutpost APT
    Reviews found online7881
Scores at a glance
CategoryMilestar Patagonia A/T ProNokian Outpost APT
Relative Score 76 79
Dry 76 81
Wet 80 86
Snow 74 72
Comfort 76 75
Noise 67 67
Treadwear 76 79
Handling (owners) 78 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Patagonia A/T Pro

± 7

Outpost APT

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Patagonia A/T Pro

Pros

  • Excellent traction in diverse weather conditions including rain, mud, and snow
  • Low road noise on the highway compared to typical aggressive all-terrain tires
  • Aggressive and attractive tread aesthetics

Cons

  • Some slight increase in road noise compared to standard highway street tires
  • Requires regular rotation every 10,000 miles to prevent uneven wear and potential noise increases
All owner themes in the Patagonia A/T Pro review

Tire B Outpost APT

Pros

  • Exceptional traction in rain, standing water, and slush
  • Reliable winter performance with 3PMSF rating
  • Sturdy construction featuring tough, puncture-resistant sidewalls

Cons

  • Slightly increased road noise or hum compared to standard all-season tires
  • Firm or stiff ride quality, particularly with higher load-rated variants
  • Reduced grip on hard-packed ice compared to dedicated winter tires
All owner themes in the Outpost APT review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro B · Nokian Outpost APT
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4537
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 21″
Tread depth14 - 18/32″13/32″
UTQG660 A A700 A A
Treadwear warranty55,000 mi65,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure47 - 80 psi47 - 51 psi
Sizes in common66

Which one should you actually buy?

Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro

Nokian Outpost APT

Narrow edge: Nokian Outpost APT — better wet, dry and treadwear. Where the Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nokian Outpost APT scores 86 vs 80 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Nokian Outpost APT scores 81 vs 76 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Nokian Outpost APT scores 79 vs 76 on treadwear.

Tire A · Milestar Patagonia A/T Pro
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nokian Outpost APT
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT?

Which is better in the wet, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT?

Nokian Outpost APT, 86 vs 80 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT?

Nokian Outpost APT, 81 vs 76 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 72 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Patagonia A/T Pro or Outpost APT?

Nokian Outpost APT, 79 vs 76 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology