Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE912 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 200 + 93 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus V12 evo2 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire AFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Ventus V12 evo2 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)71
    Reviews found online6571

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 70.5 = 71

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Ventus V12 evo2 +2
    70
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 68 (est.)69
    Reviews found online6772

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 71.8 = 70

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 68

    Comfort

    ZE912 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6666

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for ZE912 or Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–77
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 63

    Treadwear

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ventus V12 evo2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6060

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.3 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  6. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus V12 evo2 +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZE912Ventus V12 evo2
    Reviews found online6369
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE912 vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Relative Score 66 69
Dry 66 71
Wet 68 70
Comfort 68 67
Noise – 73
Treadwear 63 63
Handling (owners) 63 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE912

Ventus V12 evo2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryZE912Ventus V12 evo2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 #4/5 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

Tire B Ventus V12 evo2

Pros

  • Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
  • Comfortable ride with low initial road noise

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
  • Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
  • Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
All owner themes in the Ventus V12 evo2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—38
Rim diameters—15″ – 21″

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE912

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better handling and dry. Where the Falken ZE912 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 69 vs 63 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 71 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE912 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Which is better in the wet, ZE912 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE912 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 71 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZE912 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ZE912 or Ventus V12 evo2?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology