Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZE912 vs Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 200 + 116 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ZE912 66, HTR A/S P02 65.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZE912
Tire AFalken

ZE912

Summer

Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews

“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    HTR A/S P02 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZE912HTR A/S P02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6570

    ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.9 = 69

    No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Level
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZE912HTR A/S P02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6768

    ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 68

    No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    62
    Why this score
    SourceZE912HTR A/S P02
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online–56

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.4 = 62

    No road tests of snow for HTR A/S P02. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    ZE912 +2
    66
    Why this score
    SourceZE912HTR A/S P02
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6662

    ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for ZE912 or HTR A/S P02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZE912HTR A/S P02
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 68

    No road tests of noise for HTR A/S P02. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    ZE912 +10
    53
    Why this score
    SourceZE912HTR A/S P02
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)45
    Reviews found online6064

    ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    HTR A/S P02: 60% × 44.8 + 40% × 64.2 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    HTR A/S P02 +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceZE912HTR A/S P02
    Reviews found online6366
Scores at a glance
Falken ZE912 vs Sumitomo HTR A/S P02: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZE912Sumitomo HTR A/S P02
Relative Score 66 65
Dry 66 69
Wet 68 68
Snow – 62
Comfort 68 66
Noise – 68
Treadwear 63 53
Handling (owners) 63 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZE912

HTR A/S P02

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryZE912HTR A/S P02ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 #18/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZE912

Pros

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Strong dry-weather grip and predictable handling

Cons

  • Inconsistent tread life, with many reports of premature wear
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to a 'squishy' feel or lack of steering precision
  • Wet-weather performance is frequently described as unpredictable or lacking at the limit
All owner themes in the ZE912 review

Tire B HTR A/S P02

Pros

  • Affordable, budget-friendly pricing
  • Low road noise and comfortable, smooth ride
  • Responsive dry and wet handling

Cons

  • Tread life occasionally falls short of expected mileage warranties
  • Winter and snow traction is generally described as merely adequate or mediocre
  • Some complaints regarding balancing issues or slight hydroplaning in heavy downpours
All owner themes in the HTR A/S P02 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZE912

Mixed

Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.

Top themes
#affordable pricing and value#quiet and comfortable ride#poor snow and winter performance#noise level over time#treadwear and longevity#sidewall stiffness and handling#wet road traction

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZE912 B · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02
CategorySummerAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—600 A A
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZE912

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02

Too close to call: Falken ZE912 and Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 are within 2 points overall. Falken ZE912 is stronger on treadwear. Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 is stronger on dry.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken ZE912 scores 63 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02 scores 69 vs 66 on dry.

Tire A · Falken ZE912
Tire B · Sumitomo HTR A/S P02

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZE912 or HTR A/S P02?

Which is better in the wet, ZE912 or HTR A/S P02?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZE912 or HTR A/S P02?

Sumitomo HTR A/S P02, 69 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZE912 or HTR A/S P02?

Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 66 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ZE912 or HTR A/S P02?

Falken ZE912, 63 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology