Falken ZE912 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 200 + 900 owner reviews. How we score
ZE912 leads, 66–64 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 64 · 200 reviews
“I just put a set of Falken ZE912's on my wife's CLK and found them to be a lot quieter and smoother than the previous tires that were on the car. They aren't as precise handling as the Michelin or Pirelli's that were on there before, but definately more comfortable.”
Tests 62 · 1 test Owners 66 · 900 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 6 in 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test (subj. comfort)
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ZE912 | Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 67 (est.) | 53 |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 68 |
ZE912: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 66
Proxes TR1: 60% × 52.9 + 40% × 68.3 = 59
No road tests of dry for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
| Source | ZE912 | Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 68 (est.) | 66 |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 68 |
ZE912: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68
Proxes TR1: 60% × 66.5 + 40% × 68 = 67
No road tests of wet for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
| Source | ZE912 | Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 69 (est.) | 68 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 60 |
ZE912: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.3 = 68
Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 60.1 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ZE912. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ZE912 | Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | – | 68 |
| Reviews found online | – | ≈ 67 (est.) |
Proxes TR1: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 68
No owner ratings of noise for Proxes TR1. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | ZE912 | Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 64 (est.) | ≈ 64 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 61 |
ZE912: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63
Proxes TR1: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for ZE912. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes TR1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
| Source | ZE912 | Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 63 | 70 |
| Category | Falken ZE912 | Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 64 |
| Dry | 66 | 59 |
| Wet | 68 | 67 |
| Comfort | 68 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 63 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ZE912
Proxes TR1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ZE912 | Proxes TR1 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #13/14 2011 European Summer Tyre Test - 195/65 R15 | #5/6 2024 TopTireReview Best UHP Tyres for Asia Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community consensus on the Falken Ziex ZE912 highlights it as an affordable, comfortable, and relatively quiet all-season tire with decent dry and predictable wet traction. However, users frequently criticize its rapid treadwear, poor winter/snow grip, tendency to develop road noise over time, and softer sidewalls compared to dedicated performance summer tires.
“decent A/S tire, gets through the snow well, but not so good at corners in the snow with the large shoulder blocks.... but since the snow is only on the road for a couple days around here, they work great and I would rather have better dry traction for the 90% of the time when there is no snow. My only issue so far is they tramline when on grooved pavement because the tires have circumferential grooves”
“I just put a set of Falken ZE912's on my wife's CLK and found them to be a lot quieter and smoother than the previous tires that were on the car. They aren't as precise handling as the Michelin or Pirelli's that were on there before, but definately more comfortable.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by BobDogNdaHouse I just ordered some 912's (215/45) so I will give a review in a few weeks. I got them for $76 ea, but have seen them for $68, cant beat the price Thats a great price!!! What store did you see 215/45/17 for $68?”
Based on 50 community posts
Community sentiment regarding the Toyo Proxes TR1 is mixed, with users frequently noting an attractive price point and smooth, comfortable ride when compared to factory tires or run-flats. However, multiple drivers report shortcomings in wet-weather performance, cold grip, and road noise as mileage increases, while several criticize its soft sidewalls for creating imprecise handling at the limit.
“I had these exact tyres on my ep3, and they were brilliant compared what the car came with from factory. I can’t remember what they were, but for me , they just didn’t feel right…when I went t for these TR1’s , it felt like cars dynamics completely changed for the better. But my driving was mainly city/motorways and sometimes b-roads. And now I’m reminiscing about my type-r days…”
“Avoid TR1.. the sound will become unbearable.. I suggest Yokohama ES32..”
“Quote: Originally Posted by gamisou 70l46 did you get yours mounted and balanced for that price? I picked mine up at tiredealsforless.com for $765.12 shipped. They had the best prices that I have seen. Yep, $859 is mounted/balanced and 6% Michigan sales tax. Got them from Tireman, a Ohio/Michigan tire retailer & service center.”
Based on 36 community posts
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE912 | B · Toyo Proxes TR1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 61 |
| Rim diameters | — | 14″ – 20″ |
Falken ZE912
Toyo Proxes TR1
Narrow edge: Falken ZE912 — better dry and comfort. Pick the Toyo Proxes TR1 if handling matters most to you.
Falken ZE912 scores 66 vs 59 on dry.
Toyo Proxes TR1 scores 70 vs 63 on handling.
Falken ZE912 scores 68 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Falken ZE912, 66 vs 59 on our dry score.
Falken ZE912, 68 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
