Tests – · none yet Owners 78 · 100 reviews
Firestone TZ300 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken ZE914 vs Firestone TZ300 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 100 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
ZE914 is ahead, 75–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ZE914 +1264Why this score
Source ZE914 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 81 62 ZE914: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 76
TZ300: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 64
No road tests of dry for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
77
Wet
ZE914 +1265Why this score
Source ZE914 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 79 63 ZE914: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77
TZ300: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 65
No road tests of wet for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
ZE914 +1063Why this score
Source ZE914 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 74 61 ZE914: 40% × 69.8 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73
TZ300: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of comfort for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
72
Treadwear
ZE914 +1359Why this score
Source ZE914 TZ300 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 76 55 ZE914: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 72
TZ300: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59
No road tests of treadwear for ZE914. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for TZ300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
77
Handling (owners)
ZE914 +2255Why this score
Source ZE914 TZ300 Reviews found online 77 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZE914 | Firestone TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 63 |
| Dry | 76 | 64 |
| Wet | 77 | 65 |
| Comfort | 73 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 59 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ZE914
TZ300
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ZE914 | TZ300 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/11 2017 ACE SUV Summer Tyre Test | #19/54 2013 54 Tyre Braking Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZE914
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong, predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
- Progressive handling characteristics that provide driver confidence
Cons
- Reports of increased road noise, particularly as the tread wears down
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users experiencing premature wear
- Occasional reports of poor wet-weather traction on specific high-torque or lightweight sports vehicles
Tire B TZ300
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Generally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong traction in both wet and dry conditions for standard road use
Cons
- Inconsistent tread wear life reported across different vehicles
- Reports of increased road noise on certain road surfaces
- Unpredictable handling or light steering feel at higher speeds
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZE914 | B · Firestone TZ300 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| UTQG | 320 A - B A | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken ZE914
Firestone TZ300
Winner: Falken ZE914 — better handling, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone TZ300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 55 on handling.
Falken ZE914 scores 72 vs 59 on treadwear.
Falken ZE914 scores 76 vs 64 on dry.
Falken ZE914 scores 77 vs 65 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZE914 or TZ300?
Which is better in the wet, ZE914 or TZ300?
Falken ZE914, 77 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZE914 or TZ300?
Falken ZE914, 76 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZE914 or TZ300?
Falken ZE914, 73 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZE914 or TZ300?
Falken ZE914, 72 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology