tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S vs Hankook Ventus ST — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 18 + 23 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus ST is ahead, 76–52

Check price on Amazon · Ventus ST or ZIEX ZE001 A/S on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE001 A/S

All Season

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 18 reviews

Hankook Ventus ST
Tire BHankook

Ventus ST

Summer

± 7

Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 83 · 23 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 All Road 265/60 R18 4x4 Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    Ventus ST +20
    75
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SVentus ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 60 (est.)71
    Reviews found online4983

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55

    Ventus ST: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 82.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 54

    Wet

    Ventus ST +24
    78
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SVentus ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 58 (est.)75
    Reviews found online4883

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 58.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 54

    Ventus ST: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 83.1 = 78

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SVentus ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)–
    Reviews found online54–

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 61

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 54

    Comfort

    Ventus ST +22
    76
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SVentus ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4779

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.7 = 54

    Ventus ST: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.3 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ventus ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    Ventus ST +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SVentus ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)69
    Reviews found online55≈ 66 (est.)

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 62

    Ventus ST: 60% × 69.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 68

    No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus ST. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 40

    Treadwear

    Ventus ST +37
    77
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SVentus ST
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online2484

    ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 23.6 = 40

    Ventus ST: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 84.3 = 77

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 42

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus ST +41
    83
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SVentus ST
    Reviews found online4283
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE001 A/SVentus ST
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–57
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE001 A/SHankook Ventus ST
Relative Score 52 76
Dry 55 75
Wet 54 78
Snow 61 –
Comfort 54 76
Noise 62 68
Treadwear 40 77
Handling (owners) 42 83
Efficiency – 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ZIEX ZE001 A/S

± 7

Ventus ST

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE001 A/S

Pros

  • Quiet, comfortable ride, noted by several owners including a long-distance highway driver
  • Good dry grip and handling, with several reviewers describing wet performance as impressive or confident
  • Stable, composed behavior and good steering feedback in everyday driving, with one reviewer calling it a capable all-rounder that is not aimed at sporting use

Cons

  • Premature tread wear is the most frequent complaint, with reports of tires nearly bald or needing replacement at roughly 34-36K miles, and fast wear noted at 13K miles, 15,000 km and 20,000 km
  • Poor traction in snow, slush and ice, with some reviewers advising against use below 0°C
  • Wet-weather concerns in some cases, including hydroplaning resistance described as dangerous on a turbo Mazda 6 and looser handling in the wet late in the tire's life
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE001 A/S review

Tire B Ventus ST

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and long-lasting durability, often doubling the mileage of competing tires
  • Significantly reduced road noise and improved ride comfort compared to factory-fitted premium tires
  • Strong dry grip and dependable, predictable wet-weather performance

Cons

  • Slightly reduced feedback or a skating sensation in heavy standing water/deep puddles
  • Occasional reports of increased road noise as the tires approach the end of their tread life
  • Availability can sometimes be limited depending on the region and retailer
All owner themes in the Ventus ST review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S B · Hankook Ventus ST
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available610
Rim diameters17″ – 20″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG360 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S

Hankook Ventus ST

Winner: Hankook Ventus ST — better handling, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus ST scores 83 vs 42 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus ST scores 77 vs 40 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus ST scores 78 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus ST scores 76 vs 54 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus ST
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Ventus ST?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Ventus ST?

Hankook Ventus ST, 78 vs 54 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Ventus ST?

Hankook Ventus ST, 75 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Ventus ST?

Hankook Ventus ST, 68 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Ventus ST?

Hankook Ventus ST, 76 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Ventus ST?

Hankook Ventus ST, 77 vs 40 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology