Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 18 reviews
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S vs Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 18 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth is ahead, 60–51
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 12 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +661Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 49 57 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.9 = 61
No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
54
Wet
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +458Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 48 53 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 58 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 54
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 58
No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 54 – ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 61
No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
54
Comfort
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +862Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 47 59 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 40% × 64.2 (est.) + 60% × 46.5 = 54
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62
No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
62
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 55 – ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 62
No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
40
Treadwear
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +2565Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 51 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 23 63 ZIEX ZE001 A/S: 60% × 51.1 (est.) + 40% × 23.4 = 40
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE001 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar G055 Blue Earth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
42
Handling (owners)
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth +1355Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE001 A/S Geolandar G055 Blue Earth Reviews found online 42 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S | Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | 60 |
| Dry | 55 | 61 |
| Wet | 54 | 58 |
| Snow | 61 | – |
| Comfort | 54 | 62 |
| Noise | 62 | – |
| Treadwear | 40 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 42 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Pros
- Quiet, comfortable ride, noted by several owners including a long-distance highway driver
- Good dry grip and handling, with several reviewers describing wet performance as impressive or confident
- Stable, composed behavior and good steering feedback in everyday driving, with one reviewer calling it a capable all-rounder that is not aimed at sporting use
Cons
- Premature tread wear is the most frequent complaint, with reports of tires nearly bald or needing replacement at roughly 34-36K miles, and fast wear noted at 13K miles, 15,000 km and 20,000 km
- Poor traction in snow, slush and ice, with some reviewers advising against use below 0°C
- Wet-weather concerns in some cases, including hydroplaning resistance described as dangerous on a turbo Mazda 6 and looser handling in the wet late in the tire's life
Tire B Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Pros
- Extremely quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Improved fuel economy and low rolling resistance
- Adequate dry road grip and handling
Cons
- Dangerous or unreliable wet weather traction, particularly lateral grip and cornering
- Prone to wheel spin on damp or wet surfaces
- Accelerated or uneven tread wear reported on certain crossover and SUV models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S | B · Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 6 | — |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 360 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Falken ZIEX ZE001 A/S rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 18 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 65 vs 40 on treadwear.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 55 vs 42 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 62 vs 54 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth scores 61 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 58 vs 54 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 61 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 62 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE001 A/S or Geolandar G055 Blue Earth?
Yokohama Geolandar G055 Blue Earth, 65 vs 40 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology