Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 3 road tests and 1,244 + 28 owner reviews. How we score
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is ahead, 72–65
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Tests 61 · 3 tests Owners 67 · 28 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 3 tests | 80 | 54 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 66 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 66.4 = 74
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 54.2 + 40% × 66.1 = 59
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 3 tests | 85 | 67 |
| Reviews found online | 70 | 70 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85 + 40% × 69.6 = 79
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 70.3 = 68
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 66 |
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 68
No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 60 | ≈ 68 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 63 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60.1 + 60% × 62.5 = 62
N'Fera RU1: 40% × 67.9 (est.) + 60% × 63.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / 1 tests | 66 | 67 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 67 (est.) | 68 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 66
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 67.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 68
No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 73 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 67 |
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.7 + 40% × 63.3 = 69
N'Fera RU1: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 65 | 65 |
| Source | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / 1 tests | 31 | 53 |
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Nexen N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 65 |
| Dry | 74 | 59 |
| Wet | 79 | 68 |
| Snow | – | 68 |
| Comfort | 62 | 65 |
| Noise | 66 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 65 |
| Efficiency | 31 | 53 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
N'Fera RU1
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | N'Fera RU1 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #2/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 93% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 98% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 97% #3/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 95% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 90% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #4/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 98% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 97% #6/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 86% #5/7 · 2025 Motor Low Rolling Resistance (AA) Tyre Test | 74% #10/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Price | Cost | 72% #7/16 · 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 77% #3/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Grass Traction | Off-road | 84% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 91% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Handling | Off-road | 99% #7/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 97% #8/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Gravel Traction | Off-road | 82% #10/10 · 2021 All Road SUV Summer Tyre Test | 97% #2/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Mud Traction | Off-road | 88% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | 88% #7/10 · 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/6 2025 Wybór Kierowców Summer Tire Test R16 | #8/10 2019 SUV 4x4 Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Based on 5 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Nexen N'Fera RU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 86 | 45 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 320 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 18 | 18 |
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Nexen N'Fera RU1
Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better dry and wet. Pick the Nexen N'Fera RU1 if efficiency and comfort matter most to you.
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 53 vs 31 on efficiency.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 74 vs 59 on dry.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 68 on wet.
Nexen N'Fera RU1 scores 65 vs 62 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 68 on our wet score.
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
Nexen N'Fera RU1, 53 vs 31 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology