Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 68 · 1,241 reviews
“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”
Head-to-head
Updated
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Yokohama A539 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +768Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun A539 Professional tests (TWG score) 79 – Reviews found online 69 68 -
79
Wet
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +970Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun A539 Professional tests (TWG score) 84 – Reviews found online 71 70 -
62
Comfort
A539 +769Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun A539 Professional tests (TWG score) 60 – Reviews found online 65 70 -
66
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun A539 Professional tests (TWG score) 66 – -
69
Treadwear
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +366Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun A539 Professional tests (TWG score) 72 – Reviews found online 65 66 -
67
Handling
A539 +774Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun A539 Reviews found online 67 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 69 |
| Dry | 75 | 68 |
| Wet | 79 | 70 |
| Comfort | 62 | 69 |
| Noise | 66 | – |
| Treadwear | 69 | 66 |
| Handling | 67 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
69
/ 100
A539
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Pros
- Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
- Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
- Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
- Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
Tire B A539
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
- Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
- Good braking performance
Cons
- Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
- Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
- Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.
Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency
Based on 5 community posts
Tire B
Yokohama A539
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun | B · Yokohama A539 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 86 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 14″ – 19″ | 12″ – 14″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
69
/ 100
Yokohama A539
Winner: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Yokohama A539 if comfort and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 75 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Yokohama A539 scores 69 vs 62 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama A539 scores 74 vs 67 on handling.
Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire B · Yokohama A539
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.