tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Yokohama A539 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 0 road tests and 1,244 + 106 owner reviews. How we score

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun leads, 73–69 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or A539 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Summer

± 5

Tests 76 · 21 tests Owners 66 · 1,244 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

“Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun, very grippy especially in the wet”

Yokohama A539
Tire BYokohama

A539

Summer

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 106 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunA539
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests79≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6668

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 79.5 + 40% × 66.4 = 74

    A539: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.6 = 68

    No road tests of dry for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 79

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunA539
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / – tests85≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7071

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 85 + 40% × 69.6 = 79

    A539: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 71

    No road tests of wet for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 61

    Comfort

    A539 +8
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunA539
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests60≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6269

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 40% × 60 + 60% × 62.3 = 61

    A539: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 69.2 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 66

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunA539
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests66–
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)–

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 66.1 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 66

    No owner ratings of noise for ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 69

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunA539
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests72≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6367

    ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 63.2 = 69

    A539: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for A539. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 65

    Handling (owners)

    A539 +9
    74
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunA539
    Reviews found online6574
  7. 31

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE310 EcoRunA539
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 15 / – tests31–
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRunYokohama A539
Relative Score 73 69
Dry 74 68
Wet 79 71
Comfort 61 69
Noise 66 –
Treadwear 69 67
Handling (owners) 65 74
Efficiency 31 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

± 8

A539

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise and high cabin comfort
  • Strong grip and stability in both wet and dry weather conditions
  • Outstanding value for money compared to premium brands

Cons

  • Some drivers report higher rolling resistance and slightly increased fuel consumption
  • Soft sidewalls can lead to vague initial steering response or a less sporty feel during hard cornering
  • Occasional complaints of a firmer, harsher ride over bumps depending on vehicle suspension and aspect ratio
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun review

Tire B A539

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet cornering grip
  • Predictable and dependable handling during spirited driving
  • Good braking performance

Cons

  • Can lose traction easily when cold or under heavy throttle
  • Potential for wheel spin in wet conditions for quicker or more powerful cars
  • Can wear relatively quickly due to a softer rubber compound
All owner themes in the A539 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Positive

Community sentiment regarding the Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun is generally positive, with specific praise noted for its strong wet grip. Users frequently evaluate it as an affordable alternative alongside other budget-friendly options for smaller or standard passenger vehicles.

Top themes
#wet weather performance#budget friendly options#tire size availability#grip and handling#eco-run efficiency

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Yokohama A539

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun B · Yokohama A539
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available866
Rim diameters14″ – 19″12″ – 14″
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun

Yokohama A539

Narrow edge: Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun — better wet and dry. Pick the Yokohama A539 if handling and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama A539 scores 74 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 79 vs 71 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama A539 scores 69 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun scores 74 vs 68 on dry.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama A539
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or A539?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or A539?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 79 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or A539?

Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun, 74 vs 68 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or A539?

Yokohama A539, 69 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun or A539?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology