Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 23 reviews
Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Falken ZIEX ZE329 vs Vredestein Ultrac — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 23 + 416 owner reviews. How we score
Ultrac is ahead, 68–50
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 62 · 14 tests Owners 64 · 416 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)
“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
Ultrac +2777Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Ultrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 40 66 ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50
Ultrac: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 65.9 = 77
No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
51
Wet
Ultrac +3182Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Ultrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 56 (est.) 91 Reviews found online 45 69 ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 51
Ultrac: 60% × 91.1 + 40% × 68.8 = 82
No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
57
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Ultrac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 57
No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
51
Comfort
Ultrac +1667Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Ultrac Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 34 65 ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 51
Ultrac: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 67
No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
Ultrac +567Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Ultrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 53 ≈ 67 (est.) ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 62
Ultrac: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67
No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ultrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
46
Treadwear
ZIEX ZE329 +1828Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Ultrac Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 55 (est.) 10 Reviews found online 32 56 ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 46
Ultrac: 60% × 10 + 40% × 55.6 = 28
No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
41
Handling (owners)
Ultrac +2465Why this score
Source ZIEX ZE329 Ultrac Reviews found online 41 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Falken ZIEX ZE329 | Vredestein Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 50 | 68 |
| Dry | 50 | 77 |
| Wet | 51 | 82 |
| Snow | 57 | – |
| Comfort | 51 | 67 |
| Noise | 62 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 46 | 28 |
| Handling (owners) | 41 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ZIEX ZE329
Ultrac
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ZIEX ZE329
Pros
- Affordable price point offering great value
- Good traction and grip on dry pavement
- Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
- Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
- Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
Tire B Ultrac
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet weather conditions
- High level of ride comfort and ability to absorb road bumps
- Low road noise and quiet operation
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by several drivers
- Softer sidewalls leading to less initial steering feedback or stability
- Occasional complaints of tramlining or tracking narrow road repairs
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Falken ZIEX ZE329
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Vredestein Ultrac
Community opinion on Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro tires is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising them as a high-value alternative to premium brands like Michelin. Users frequently highlight their comfortable ride, low noise levels, and impressive dry and wet grip that rivals top-tier performance tires at a fraction of the cost.
“I'm currently on Vredestein Ultrac Pros and I'm very happy with them. I would say they're 90% of PS4S for 50% of the price. They're quieter and more comfortable than the stock Pzeros. I highly recommend them. Like you, I run summers year round.”
“Need new tires... Anyone have Vredestein Ultrac Pro tires? Need new tires on my 2023 Model 3 Performance with 235/45R20 size. I noticed the Vredestein Ultrac Pro tires have great reviews from a couple UK tests, but they are new and not yet popular in the US. Does anyone have any thoughts on them? They are HALF the price of Michelin PS4S. I don't care at all about snow or rain performance (no CrossClimates), as I'm in warm Southern California. I mainly care about rolling resistance, having good steering feel, and not needing to replace them every 20k miles.”
“The Vredestein Ultrac Sessanta are probably the best sport tyres ever made. Ive sold tyres for a living since I was 16, I've tried and tested hundreds of different tyres so i can give my customers the best advice, so I class myself as somewhat of an expert. The Sessantas are brilliant. I had them on an X5 for 8,000 miles, they couldn't have performed all round any better. EDIT: Oh and they wear so evenly it's unbelievable!”
Based on 20 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Falken ZIEX ZE329 | B · Vredestein Ultrac |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 65 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 6/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Falken ZIEX ZE329
Vredestein Ultrac
Winner: Vredestein Ultrac — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE329 if treadwear matters most to you.
Vredestein Ultrac scores 82 vs 51 on wet.
Vredestein Ultrac scores 77 vs 50 on dry.
Vredestein Ultrac scores 65 vs 41 on handling.
Falken ZIEX ZE329 scores 46 vs 28 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?
Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?
Vredestein Ultrac, 82 vs 51 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?
Vredestein Ultrac, 77 vs 50 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?
Vredestein Ultrac, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?
Vredestein Ultrac, 67 vs 51 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?
Falken ZIEX ZE329, 46 vs 28 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology