Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE329 vs Vredestein Ultrac — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 14 road tests and 23 + 416 owner reviews. How we score

Ultrac is ahead, 68–50

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE329

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 23 reviews

Vredestein Ultrac

Ultrac

Summer

Tests 62 · 14 tests Owners 64 · 416 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)

“New boots! Vredestein Ultrac Pro 225s for the Turbo 3”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    Ultrac +27
    77
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 56 (est.)84
    Reviews found online4066

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    Ultrac: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 65.9 = 77

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Ultrac +31
    82
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests≈ 56 (est.)91
    Reviews found online4569

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 51

    Ultrac: 60% × 91.1 + 40% × 68.8 = 82

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 57

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online48–

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 57

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 51

    Comfort

    Ultrac +16
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3465

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 51

    Ultrac: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 65 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Ultrac +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 67 (est.)67
    Reviews found online53≈ 67 (est.)

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 62

    Ultrac: 60% × 66.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 67

    No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ultrac. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    ZIEX ZE329 +18
    28
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ultrac
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 55 (est.)10
    Reviews found online3256

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 46

    Ultrac: 60% × 10 + 40% × 55.6 = 28

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 41

    Handling (owners)

    Ultrac +24
    65
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ultrac
    Reviews found online4165
Scores at a glance
Falken ZIEX ZE329 vs Vredestein Ultrac: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE329Vredestein Ultrac
Relative Score 50 68
Dry 50 77
Wet 51 82
Snow 57 –
Comfort 51 67
Noise 62 67
Treadwear 46 28
Handling (owners) 41 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZIEX ZE329

Ultrac

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE329

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering great value
  • Good traction and grip on dry pavement
  • Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
  • Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
  • Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE329 review

Tire B Ultrac

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet weather conditions
  • High level of ride comfort and ability to absorb road bumps
  • Low road noise and quiet operation

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by several drivers
  • Softer sidewalls leading to less initial steering feedback or stability
  • Occasional complaints of tramlining or tracking narrow road repairs
All owner themes in the Ultrac review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE329

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Vredestein Ultrac

Positive

Community opinion on Vredestein Ultrac and Ultrac Pro tires is overwhelmingly positive, with drivers praising them as a high-value alternative to premium brands like Michelin. Users frequently highlight their comfortable ride, low noise levels, and impressive dry and wet grip that rivals top-tier performance tires at a fraction of the cost.

Top themes
#Price and Value#Performance vs Michelin#Ride Comfort and Noise#Handling and Cornering Grip#Tread Wear and Longevity#Wet Weather Performance

Based on 20 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE329 B · Vredestein Ultrac
CategoryAll-SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—65
Rim diameters—15″ – 21″
Tread depth6/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE329

Vredestein Ultrac

Winner: Vredestein Ultrac — better wet, dry and handling. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE329 if treadwear matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Ultrac scores 82 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Vredestein Ultrac scores 77 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Ultrac scores 65 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken ZIEX ZE329 scores 46 vs 28 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?

Vredestein Ultrac, 82 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?

Vredestein Ultrac, 77 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?

Vredestein Ultrac, 67 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?

Vredestein Ultrac, 67 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE329 or Ultrac?

Falken ZIEX ZE329, 46 vs 28 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology