tirewheelguide

Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE329 vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 23 + 2,189 owner reviews. How we score

ADVAN Fleva V701 is ahead, 65–51

Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701 or ZIEX ZE329 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE329

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 23 reviews

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 58 · 2,189 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +24
    74
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 56 (est.)77
    Reviews found online4069

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 68.5 = 74

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 51

    Wet

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +17
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 56 (est.)70
    Reviews found online4565

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 51

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 65.2 = 68

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 57

    Snow

    ZIEX ZE329 +23
    34
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 50 (est.)
    Reviews found online4810

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 57

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 10.4 = 34

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 51

    Comfort

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +12
    63
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)62
    Reviews found online3463

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 51

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 62.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    70
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)75
    Reviews found online5362

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 62

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 61.8 = 70

    No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +23
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 55 (est.)74
    Reviews found online3261

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 46

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.1 + 40% × 60.8 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 41

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +30
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329ADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online4171
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE329Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 51 65
Dry 50 74
Wet 51 68
Snow 57 34
Comfort 51 63
Noise 62 70
Treadwear 46 69
Handling (owners) 41 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZIEX ZE329

ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE329

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering great value
  • Good traction and grip on dry pavement
  • Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
  • Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
  • Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE329 review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE329

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Neutral

Community discussions around the Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 primarily consist of prospective buyers asking about daily drivability, treadwear longevity, and value compared to premium alternatives. Those considering or using them note solid availability in smaller or niche wheel sizes and appreciate their accessible price point. The limited direct experiential feedback praises responsive turn-in, stiffer sidewalls, and decent ride comfort compared to rival sporty summer tires.

r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
fiestastforum.com ·2022-11-30

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”
Top themes
#daily driving suitability#treadwear and lifespan#budget summer performance#comparison to Michelin#steering feel and turn-in#wheel sizing availability

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE329 B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategoryAll-SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—70
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth6/32″9/32″
UTQG480 A A300 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE329

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Winner: Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — better handling, dry and treadwear. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE329 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Falken ZIEX ZE329 scores 57 vs 34 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 69 vs 46 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE329
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Falken ZIEX ZE329, 57 vs 34 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 70 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 63 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE329 or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology