tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun vs Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 4 road tests and 631 + 2,201 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun and ADVAN Fleva V701 are level at 65.

Check price on Amazon · ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun Check price on Amazon · ADVAN Fleva V701
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Summer

± 8

Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 60 · 631 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Tire BYokohama

ADVAN Fleva V701

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 4 tests Owners 57 · 2,201 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“I just got the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701's and I like them a lot. The turn in is quicker and the feel is better than the Indy 500's that I had before. They feel more solid and less vague.The sidewall seems a bit stiffer, but somehow the ride is not as harsh.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    74
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests6778
    Reviews found online6368

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 67.5 + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 77.7 + 40% × 67.5 = 74

  2. 72

    Wet

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests7670
    Reviews found online6564

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 64.8 = 72

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 70 + 40% × 63.7 = 67

  3. 55

    Snow

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun +19
    36
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 52 (est.)
    Reviews found online4512

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 55

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 52 (est.) + 40% × 12.2 = 36

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for ADVAN Fleva V701. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7262
    Reviews found online5961

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 40% × 72.2 + 60% × 58.6 = 64

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 40% × 62.4 + 60% × 60.9 = 62

  5. 61

    Noise

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +7
    68
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6474
    Reviews found online5760

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 64 + 40% × 56.6 = 61

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 74.4 + 40% × 59.5 = 68

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 65 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6259

    ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64

    ADVAN Fleva V701: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 59.3 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 66

    Handling (owners)

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +5
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701
    Reviews found online6671
  8. 63

    Efficiency

    ADVAN Fleva V701 +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests6371
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRunYokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Relative Score 65 65
Dry 66 74
Wet 72 67
Snow 55 36
Comfort 64 62
Noise 61 68
Treadwear 64 69
Handling (owners) 66 71
Efficiency 63 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

± 6

ADVAN Fleva V701

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryZIEX ZE914 EcoRunADVAN Fleva V701ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #5/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 97% #8/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 97% #18/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 98% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 92% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 92% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 96% #5/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 87% #21/45 · 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 95% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 95% #16/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 88% #5/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 56% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Noise Noise 97% #13/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 74% #15/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 82% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 58% #13/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 71% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #8/20 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test #6/22 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Pros

  • Exceptional value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong and predictable wet and dry traction
  • Stiff sidewalls providing crisp steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Increased road noise or droning, particularly on coarse asphalt or as the tire wears
  • Stiffer ride quality and harshness over bumps due to fortified sidewalls
  • Wet grip performance dropping noticeably as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun review

Tire B ADVAN Fleva V701

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
  • Noticeably quieter and more comfortable than many competing UHP tires
  • Precise steering response and good road feedback

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear reported by aggressive drivers
  • Some complaints regarding soft sidewalls leading to initial turn-in delay or tramlining
  • Occasional reports of elevated road noise depending on the vehicle and road surface
All owner themes in the ADVAN Fleva V701 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Positive

The community generally views the Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 as a strong, high-value summer tire ideal for daily driving, spirited backroad runs, and wet weather conditions. Drivers praise its sharp turn-in, stiff sidewalls, and dependable grip compared to other budget or mid-tier alternatives, though some debate its lifespan and how it stacks up against premium options like Michelin.

r/mr2 ·2 upvotes ·2025-05-24

“Yokohama advan fleva v701? Currently looking at stock sizes for my 99 MRS and the v701s are the only decent set I can find. I live in Canada and I was planning on ordering them for next week, and just thought to do one more validation check before driving out to Bellingham. Pretty new to picking out my own tires, trying to also stay within 550-600usd or maxish 800-850cad including tax if possible.”
r/Civic_Type_R ·3 upvotes ·2026-09-05

“Suggestiona on tyres Hi everyone, Just wanted to ask if you guys ever had Yokohama Advan Fleva V701. My FK2 has nearly 400bhp and I’m not using it daily anymore as I want it to preserve the baby. My drive is a bit aggressive occasionally but nothing crazy or track day as I don’t have the time. I would like to know if you guys ever had this specific type of tyre. What you think about? They’re actually good? I wouldn’t like to buy again the Michelin pilot sport 4s which I found absolutely rubbish. I found those yoko for the decent price of 98£ each. So I buy it or should I move to Pirelli PZero pZ4 sport ?”
r/TyreReviews ·2 upvotes ·2026-06-06

“Yokohama Advan Fleva V701 in 2026 Do they make sense today? I’d put them on a hatchback (1300kg) and I usually drive up to 180-200 km/h with quick accelerations and curves in my daily. Weather is usually sunny, but sometimes it rains. Are them still a safe and a good choice, or are there some other brands that should result better for my driving style (and for my 215/45 r18 rims)? Thanks in advance.”
Top themes
#Daily driving comfort#Wet and dry grip#Spirited backroad handling#Value for money#Tire wear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness

Based on 22 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available1770
Rim diameters14″ – 18″15″ – 20″
Tread depth9/32″9/32″
UTQG320 A A300 A A
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common1010

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701

Too close to call: Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun and Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 are within 2 points overall. Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun is stronger on snow and wet. Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 is stronger on dry, efficiency and noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun scores 55 vs 36 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 71 vs 63 on efficiency.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701 scores 68 vs 61 on noise.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun, 72 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Falken ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun, 55 vs 36 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 68 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, ZIEX ZE914 EcoRun or ADVAN Fleva V701?

Yokohama ADVAN Fleva V701, 71 vs 63 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology