Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 102 reviews
Firestone Destination LE2 vs General Grabber HTS60 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 102 + 492 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber HTS60 is ahead, 77–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 492 reviews
Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“Grabber HTS60 I'm not going to write a novel. But I just installed these new tires 275/60/20 to replace my all terrain tires. They are virtually silent. Close to 20 lbs lighter than the all terrains and on Friday my drive to work used 12.5kwh and today (in the rain) 8.6kwh. That's a massive difference! 45% more efficient? Probably not really but 20%+? Possibly! Nearly 3 years I've never seen my efficiency graph as high as today. So happy I might hit over 300+ miles now!”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Grabber HTS60 +1077Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 67 81 Destination LE2: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.5 (est.) + 40% × 81 = 77
No road tests of dry for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Grabber HTS60 +979Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 77 (est.) Reviews found online 69 82 Destination LE2: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 76.9 (est.) + 40% × 81.8 = 79
No road tests of wet for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
Grabber HTS60 +672Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 64 73 Destination LE2: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 66
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.6 (est.) + 40% × 73 = 72
No road tests of snow for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
64
Comfort
Grabber HTS60 +1377Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 62 80 Destination LE2: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 61.5 = 64
Grabber HTS60: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77
No road tests of comfort for Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
Grabber HTS60 +473Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 84 Destination LE2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.5 = 69
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.6 = 73
No road tests of noise for Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Treadwear
Grabber HTS60 +977Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Grabber HTS60 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 69 82 Destination LE2: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 82.2 = 77
No road tests of treadwear for Destination LE2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Grabber HTS60 +1279Why this score
Source Destination LE2 Grabber HTS60 Reviews found online 67 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination LE2 | General Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 77 |
| Dry | 67 | 77 |
| Wet | 70 | 79 |
| Snow | 66 | 72 |
| Comfort | 64 | 77 |
| Noise | 69 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 77 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Destination LE2
Grabber HTS60
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination LE2
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet traction
- Affordable, high-value pricing
- Quiet and comfortable highway ride
Cons
- Tendency to pick up and retain small stones from gravel roads
- Occasional reports of higher-than-expected road noise on specific vehicle models
- Isolated instances of balancing difficulties or premature wear
Tire B Grabber HTS60
Pros
- Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
- Great value and affordable price point compared to premium brands
- Reliable all-season traction in wet, dry, and light winter conditions
Cons
- Occasional reports of minor road noise or hum at higher speeds
- Potential manufacturing inconsistencies, such as tires being out-of-round
- Aggressive tread pattern can occasionally cause slight slippage on loose dirt or debris when taking off
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Firestone Destination LE2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
General Grabber HTS60
Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.
“I am a big fan of General tires in general in the moderate budget category... they are a great cost to benefit tire and part of Continental tires. The Grabber HTS 60 is a great tire... as long as you don't have to deal with winter conditions. An alternative I have seen people extremely happy with is the Nexen Roadian HTX2 or the Cooper Discoverer AT3 4S... but in my neck of the woods we don't usually use "3-season" tires (which is what all-season tires really are these days) very often, but really like all-weather tires or using all-seasons in conjunction with dedicated winter/snow tires.”
“I have an R and a GL. The Duellers are junky tires. They will do the job but the ride really suffers. Those LTX are fantastic, but a large premium on them. I run General Grabber HTS60's. They are very quiet and comfortable. They are a significant improvement over the dueller at a better more manageable price. Dan”
“As a general statement typically AT's are noisier than All Season tires. How much more depends on the individual tire. Hit up YouTube or sites like Tire Rack to check the reviews out. I just had a set of General Grabber HTS60's put on my truck today. They got very good reviews everywhere I checked. I personally didn't want a set of AT's but General Grabber makes a nice looking set of the AT's as well and the prices on the Grabber looks to be reasonable. They were on mine. As far as the SRA's go just about anything is an improvement. But I will say, they are quiet on dry road but so are many other tires that are higher quality.”
Based on 38 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination LE2 | B · General Grabber HTS60 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 5 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 10 - 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 520 A B | 620 - 680 A A - B |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 44 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Destination LE2
General Grabber HTS60
Winner: General Grabber HTS60 — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 64 on comfort.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 79 vs 67 on handling.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 67 on dry.
General Grabber HTS60 scores 79 vs 70 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60?
Which is better in the wet, Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 79 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 67 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 72 vs 66 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 73 vs 69 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 64 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Destination LE2 or Grabber HTS60?
General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology