Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 39 reviews
Firestone Destination M/T2 vs Cooper Discoverer STT PRO — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 39 + 422 owner reviews. How we score
Destination M/T2 leads, 66–64 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 422 reviews
“New shoes. Cooper Discoverer STT Pro. 285/75/16”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
67
Dry
Destination M/T2 +364Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Discoverer STT PRO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 63 Destination M/T2: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67
Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
No road tests of dry for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
Destination M/T2 +368Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Discoverer STT PRO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 71 67 Destination M/T2: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 71
Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68
No road tests of wet for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
Destination M/T2 +467Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Discoverer STT PRO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 71 65 Destination M/T2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71
Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 67
No road tests of snow for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Destination M/T2 +854Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Discoverer STT PRO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 59 48 Destination M/T2: 40% × 66.7 (est.) + 60% × 58.7 = 62
Discoverer STT PRO: 40% × 64.4 (est.) + 60% × 47.6 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
59
Noise
Destination M/T2 +653Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Discoverer STT PRO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 47 32 Destination M/T2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 59
Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 53
No road tests of noise for Destination M/T2 or Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
56
Treadwear
Discoverer STT PRO +662Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Discoverer STT PRO Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 50 60 Destination M/T2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56
Discoverer STT PRO: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Destination M/T2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Discoverer STT PRO. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison52Why this score
Source Destination M/T2 Discoverer STT PRO Reviews found online – 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Destination M/T2 | Cooper Discoverer STT PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 64 |
| Dry | 67 | 64 |
| Wet | 71 | 68 |
| Snow | 71 | 67 |
| Comfort | 62 | 54 |
| Noise | 59 | 53 |
| Treadwear | 56 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Destination M/T2
Discoverer STT PRO
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Destination M/T2
Pros
- Unexpectedly low road noise for a mud-terrain tire
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, and deep snow
- Good highway manners and stable handling
Cons
- Can develop cupping and increased noise if maintenance/rotations are neglected
- Slight initial slip on road paint during the first few thousand miles
- Mixed reports on longevity when heavily utilized for towing or rough gravel service
Tire B Discoverer STT PRO
Pros
- Outstanding off-road traction in mud, rocks, and dirt
- Surprisingly low road noise and smooth ride for a mud-terrain tire
- Aggressive and appealing visual design with tough sidewalls
Cons
- Can be difficult to balance properly, leading to vibrations for some users
- Faster tread wear reported by a subset of drivers under heavy use
- Reduced traction in specific conditions like deep sand or packed snow/ice
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Firestone Destination M/T2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Cooper Discoverer STT PRO
Community members widely praise the Cooper Discoverer STT PRO for its exceptional off-road traction, towing capability, and dependable handling in mud, rain, and snow. While users note it balances well and rides comfortably for a mud-terrain tire, the most common criticisms involve pavement road noise that increases with wear and concerns regarding tread life on heavy trucks.
“I thought I'd throw my two cents in! I put 5 Cooper Discoverer STT Pro tires on my 2015 Nissan Xterra Pro-4 X in 2021. It cannot be overstated - I LOVE these tires! They're great in dry conditions, they're great in the rain, they're great in the snow, they're great on ice - they even drove over a frozen iceberg in my driveway during a winter emergency as though it wasn't even there. There's a little bit of road noise, but nothing terrible. You can definitely "feel" them when you're driving - but I kind of like that. My truck sits outside during all kinds of Ohio weather, and they don't appear to be cracking/dry rotting quite yet. It will technically be "due" for me to get a new set of tires next year. Without a doubt, I'm getting another set of these!! Happy trails, all!”
“I run a set of Nankang Mudstar tires on my 94 F350, also overseas cheap MTs. For the price, they are about what you'd expect. Very loud, very rough riding, wear fairly quickly. But they were like $600 shipped to my door for a set of 315/75R16, E load range. On my 89 F350 that I drive more often and pull trailers with, I have a set of Cooper Discoverer STT Pros. Night and day difference, but I can buy 2 sets of Nankangs for the cost of 1 set of Coopers. I don't know that I'd risk cheaper tires on my daily driver though. That being said, I do like the look of those Crosswinds.”
“I have never been let down by Cooper Discoverer STT PRO or BFGoodrich KO2 off road tires. I love the traction the Cooper STT PRO give me off-roading in the desert. I drove on KO2 from the 2018 until I got my STT PRO. I had Firestone’s as original equipment on a couple different vehicles and never had so many flats (on road or off road).”
Based on 38 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Destination M/T2 | B · Cooper Discoverer STT PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 18 | 23 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 19/32″ | 18 - 22/32″ |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 14 | 14 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Destination M/T2
Cooper Discoverer STT PRO
Narrow edge: Firestone Destination M/T2 — better comfort, noise and snow. Pick the Cooper Discoverer STT PRO if treadwear matters most to you.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 62 vs 54 on comfort.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 59 vs 53 on noise.
Cooper Discoverer STT PRO scores 62 vs 56 on treadwear.
Firestone Destination M/T2 scores 71 vs 67 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Destination M/T2 or Discoverer STT PRO?
Which is better in the wet, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer STT PRO?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 68 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer STT PRO?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 67 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer STT PRO?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 71 vs 67 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer STT PRO?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 59 vs 53 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer STT PRO?
Firestone Destination M/T2, 62 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Destination M/T2 or Discoverer STT PRO?
Cooper Discoverer STT PRO, 62 vs 56 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology