Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Firehawk AS vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 8 + 910 owner reviews. How we score

Dynapro HT RH12 leads, 66–64 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire AFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HT RH12

All-Season tire

Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Dynapro HT RH12 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Dynapro HT RH12 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6466

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 61

    Snow

    Firehawk AS +1
    60
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5653

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 61

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Dynapro HT RH12 +2
    67
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6166

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 65

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Dynapro HT RH12 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6775

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +2
    64
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HT RH12
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)64
    Reviews found online6664

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.6 = 66

    Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Dynapro HT RH12 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceFirehawk ASDynapro HT RH12
    Reviews found online6165
Scores at a glance
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Firehawk ASHankook Dynapro HT RH12
Relative Score 64 66
Dry 65 67
Wet 65 67
Snow 61 60
Comfort 65 67
Noise 67 70
Treadwear 66 64
Handling (owners) 61 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Firehawk AS

Dynapro HT RH12

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Tire B Dynapro HT RH12

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone Firehawk AS

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Positive

Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”

r/denverlist ·2025-12-09

“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”

ridgelineownersclub.com ·2012-10-28

“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”

Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability

Based on 8 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Firehawk AS B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available424
Rim diameters15″ – 18″15″ – 22″
Tread depth11/32″14/32″
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi40,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi54 psi
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Firehawk AS

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

Narrow edge: Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — better noise. Where the Firestone Firehawk AS is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 70 vs 67 on noise.

Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 60 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or Dynapro HT RH12?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology