Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 4 road tests and 8 + 2,579 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate 2 SUV is ahead, 83–69
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 87 · 4 tests Owners 82 · 2,579 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2023 SUV All Season Tyre Test (dry braking)
“I have the Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV tyres . The many reviews I read approved of their performance in snowy conditions (if that is an issue where you live) and also their dry condition performance. They supposedly have a decent life span. They felt nicer to drive on than the Primacy tyres . They weren't cheap at about £170 each fitted but will give me some insurance about snowy conditions and will hopefully last until I swap the car in about 3 years.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
CrossClimate 2 SUV +1787Why this score
Source Firehawk AS CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 71 88 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 85.9 + 40% × 88.1 = 87
No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
69
Wet
CrossClimate 2 SUV +1584Why this score
Source Firehawk AS CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 68 85 Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 84.7 = 84
No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
66
Snow
CrossClimate 2 SUV +2490Why this score
Source Firehawk AS CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 97 Reviews found online 62 80 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 97.4 + 40% × 80.1 = 90
No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
69
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 SUV +1685Why this score
Source Firehawk AS CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 69 88 Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 40% × 81.3 + 60% × 87.6 = 85
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Noise
CrossClimate 2 SUV +676Why this score
Source Firehawk AS CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 74 ≈ 66 (est.) Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 82.1 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 76
No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
Level70Why this score
Source Firehawk AS CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 72 73 Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
CrossClimate 2 SUV: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossClimate 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
67
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate 2 SUV +2289Why this score
Source Firehawk AS CrossClimate 2 SUV Reviews found online 67 89 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison87Why this score
Source Firehawk AS CrossClimate 2 SUV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 87
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk AS | Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 83 |
| Dry | 70 | 87 |
| Wet | 69 | 84 |
| Snow | 66 | 90 |
| Comfort | 69 | 85 |
| Noise | 70 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 89 |
| Efficiency | – | 87 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Firehawk AS
83
/ 100
CrossClimate 2 SUV
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Tire B CrossClimate 2 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional wet, ice, and snow traction that inspires winter-weather driving confidence
- Significantly improved ride comfort and impact absorption over road imperfections
- Impressive tread life and durability yielding long-term value
Cons
- Higher initial purchase price compared to competitors
- Minor fuel economy or range drop reported by some users, especially on hybrids and EVs
- Occasional low-pitched or increased road noise at highway speeds (between 50-70 MPH)
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Firestone Firehawk AS
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Community members generally view the Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV as a premium, dependable tire known for strong snow and dry performance, comfortable driving feel, and valuable 3PMS certification. Discussions frequently center around sizing availability, comparison to other models like the Primacy or standard CrossClimate 2, and choosing between specific speed or OEM ratings.
mbworld.org
“So here's the latest on Tires recommendations: (still dithering). Looking for smooth, soft ride, good mileage. I do have a mountain home; use ~30ish days during winter ski season, but mostly highway driving in Southern California ( don't disparage me for being a Californian. I cant stand the people or the government too lol. But it's a beautiful state). 2020 300GLC 4MATIC California car, 235/60 18H rating What will it be...?????? MICHELIN DEFENDER LTX M/S - seems like you guys are in favor. But hard to get. And the size is a 235/60 106T designation. Is the T speed max of 116mph not safe enough when OEM was an H rating 130mph? MICHELIN DEFENDER2. $238. Tire rack MICHELIN CrossClimate2 SUV tire rack $248. - hearing both good and bad. I heard they're soft and mileage tanks. Check out reviews on the Michelin USA official site. Pretty interesting. CONTINENTAL CROSSCONTACT LX25 $222. tire rack high rating? Also just got this from TireRack customer service CONTINENTAL EXTREMECONTACT DWS 06 PLUS. $238. Not sure, seems like TR is trying to promote them for Cont.”
r/CarTalkUK
·2 upvotes ·2024-11-07
“Opinions please ... Michelin Primacy 4+ vs Michelin Cross Climate 2 SUV? Hi all ... I'm coming up to tyre replacement time so I've looking at what's around. Currently on Bridgestone Turanzas cos that's what came with the car, but I'm not hugely impressed with their lifespan, they seem to pick up sidewall damage easily and the tread seems to age quickly. Which is not much cop when all i do is commute round Southern England. I've pretty much settled on Michelin Primacy 4+ or Cross Climate 2 SUV but I'm having difficulty making a final decision. So I thought the hivemind might settle this: in your experience which one is best for lifespan and fuel consumption? Car is a 2018 SEAT Ateca with 18" alloys. Edit: well guys, I went with the Cross Climates, thanks for the advice!”
r/tires
·1 upvote ·2025-11-12
“I just bought Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV for my Range Rover Sport and the reason is that I needed/wanted 3PMS certification. Also in my driving career I’ve always found Michelin better for everyday use compared to Pirelli which I instead preferred for performance and weekend fun.”
Top themes
#snow and dry performance#speed and OEM ratings#tire size availability#comfort and driving feel#comparison with Primacy#SUV versus standard version
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk AS | B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 5 | 35 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 480 A A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk AS
83
/ 100
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV — better snow, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 90 vs 66 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 89 vs 67 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 87 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV scores 85 vs 69 on comfort.
Tire A · Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Firehawk AS or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Which is better in the wet, Firehawk AS or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 84 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Firehawk AS or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 87 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Firehawk AS or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 90 vs 66 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Firehawk AS or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 76 vs 70 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Firehawk AS or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV, 85 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Firehawk AS or CrossClimate 2 SUV?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology