Tests – · none yet Owners 33 · 182 reviews
Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 182 + 2,712 owner reviews. How we score
Ecowing ES01 KH27 is ahead, 64–44
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 2,712 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
48
Dry
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +1563Why this score
Source Multihawk 2 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 55 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 37 61 Multihawk 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.4 = 48
Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of dry for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
43
Wet
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +2164Why this score
Source Multihawk 2 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 50 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 33 61 Multihawk 2: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 33.3 = 43
Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64
No road tests of wet for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
43
Comfort
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +2467Why this score
Source Multihawk 2 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 31 66 Multihawk 2: 40% × 61 (est.) + 60% × 31.1 = 43
Ecowing ES01 KH27: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
43
Treadwear
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +2265Why this score
Source Multihawk 2 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 53 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 29 64 Multihawk 2: 60% × 53 (est.) + 40% × 28.6 = 43
Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
37
Handling (owners)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 +2158Why this score
Source Multihawk 2 Ecowing ES01 KH27 Reviews found online 37 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Multihawk 2 | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 44 | 64 |
| Dry | 48 | 63 |
| Wet | 43 | 64 |
| Comfort | 43 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 43 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 37 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Multihawk 2
Ecowing ES01 KH27
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Multihawk 2 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #12/14 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 | #6/16 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Multihawk 2
Pros
- Reliable dry grip and handling performance
- High ride comfort and low noise levels
- Affordable price and good overall value
Cons
- Poor wet-weather traction and dangerous sliding behavior in rain
- Pronounced understeer on wet surfaces
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
Tire B Ecowing ES01 KH27
Pros
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing
Cons
- Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
- Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
- Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Multihawk 2 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 22 | — |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 14″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone Multihawk 2
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 67 vs 43 on comfort.
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 65 vs 43 on treadwear.
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 64 vs 43 on wet.
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 58 vs 37 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Which is better in the wet, Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 64 vs 43 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 63 vs 48 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 67 vs 43 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 65 vs 43 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology