Head-to-head Updated

Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 182 + 2,712 owner reviews. How we score

Ecowing ES01 KH27 is ahead, 64–44

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 48

    Dry

    Ecowing ES01 KH27 +15
    63
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online3761

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.4 = 48

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 43

    Wet

    Ecowing ES01 KH27 +21
    64
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 50 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online3361

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 50.2 (est.) + 40% × 33.3 = 43

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 43

    Comfort

    Ecowing ES01 KH27 +24
    67
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3166

    Multihawk 2: 40% × 61 (est.) + 60% × 31.1 = 43

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67

    No road tests of comfort for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 43

    Treadwear

    Ecowing ES01 KH27 +22
    65
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online2964

    Multihawk 2: 60% × 53 (est.) + 40% × 28.6 = 43

    Ecowing ES01 KH27: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.3 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Multihawk 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES01 KH27. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 37

    Handling (owners)

    Ecowing ES01 KH27 +21
    58
    Why this score
    SourceMultihawk 2Ecowing ES01 KH27
    Reviews found online3758
Scores at a glance
Firestone Multihawk 2 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone Multihawk 2Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Relative Score 44 64
Dry 48 63
Wet 43 64
Comfort 43 67
Treadwear 43 65
Handling (owners) 37 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Multihawk 2

± 8

Ecowing ES01 KH27

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryMultihawk 2Ecowing ES01 KH27ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #12/14 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 #6/16 2019 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Multihawk 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry grip and handling performance
  • High ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Affordable price and good overall value

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather traction and dangerous sliding behavior in rain
  • Pronounced understeer on wet surfaces
  • Rapid tread wear reported by some users
All owner themes in the Multihawk 2 review

Tire B Ecowing ES01 KH27

Pros

  • Low road noise and quiet operation
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Exceptional value for money and affordable pricing

Cons

  • Inconsistent wet weather traction and a tendency to slip on damp roundabouts
  • Softer sidewalls that can result in a vague or 'jelly-like' handling feel when pushed
  • Lacks confidence for spirited or aggressive driving styles
All owner themes in the Ecowing ES01 KH27 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone Multihawk 2 B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available22—
Rim diameters13″ – 14″—

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone Multihawk 2

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — better comfort, treadwear and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 67 vs 43 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 65 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 64 vs 43 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 58 vs 37 on handling.

Tire A · Firestone Multihawk 2
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Which is better in the wet, Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 64 vs 43 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 63 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 67 vs 43 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Multihawk 2 or Ecowing ES01 KH27?

Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27, 65 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology