tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Firestone RoadHawk vs General Grabber X3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 17 + 0 road tests and 644 + 119 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber X3 is ahead, 67–62

Check price on Amazon · Grabber X3 or RoadHawk on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone RoadHawk
Tire AFirestone

RoadHawk

Summer

Tests 70 · 17 tests Owners 48 · 644 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”

General Grabber X3
Tire BGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / – tests82≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5271

    RoadHawk: 60% × 81.7 + 40% × 52.2 = 70

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 68

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / – tests76≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5671

    RoadHawk: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 55.5 = 68

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    Grabber X3 +5
    64
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests67≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4658

    RoadHawk: 60% × 67 + 40% × 46.4 = 59

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 45

    Noise

    Grabber X3 +16
    61
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / – tests30≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)52

    RoadHawk: 60% × 30.5 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 45

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    No owner ratings of noise for RoadHawk. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Grabber X3 +11
    65
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkGrabber X3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests65≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3765

    RoadHawk: 60% × 64.7 + 40% × 37.1 = 54

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 43

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber X3 +15
    58
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkGrabber X3
    Reviews found online4358
Scores at a glance
CategoryFirestone RoadHawkGeneral Grabber X3
Relative Score 62 67
Dry 70 70
Wet 68 71
Snow – 70
Comfort 59 64
Noise 45 61
Treadwear 54 65
Handling (owners) 43 58

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

RoadHawk

Grabber X3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A RoadHawk

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance, particularly in standing water and heavy rain
  • Strong dry grip and confident cornering for daily driving
  • Comfortable ride quality with good bump absorption

Cons

  • Accelerated and sometimes uneven tread wear, resulting in shorter-than-expected lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a visual 'under-inflated' bulge and spongy cornering response
  • Limited steering feedback and precision during spirited driving
All owner themes in the RoadHawk review

Tire B Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone RoadHawk

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed perspectives on the Firestone Roadhawk, noting reasonable reviews alongside concerns regarding tread wear. While some test results place it competitively among budget-friendly summer options, owners also discuss practical issues such as unusual noises, generational replacement difficulties, and overall value.

r/automobil ·2025-11-20

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”
bobistheoilguy.com ·2023-09-18

“Not sure if it is what you are looking for. I am Polish but I live in the USA. I am still following info from Poland but I am not buying tires there anymore. A magazine Motor tests tires. magazynauto.pl Firestone was included in their "accessibly priced" summer tires: Firestone Roadhawk. They lost to Uniroyal, Semperit, Dębica but were ahead of Kumho, Apollo, Tomket, Imperial and Double Coin. They were not included in their premium and middle priced test. German based Auto Bild (and its Polish version Auto Świat) did a test in 2019 and the same Roadhawk passed the elimination test (53 down to 20: wet and dry braking distances added together as #13) and finished #18 in detailed test. So Firestone is present in Poland and Europe as a cheaper brand from Bridgestone but how popular it is I do not know. Krzyś”
Top themes
#tread wear concerns#budget tire test results#replacement availability issues#generation differences#driving noise symptoms

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

General Grabber X3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone RoadHawk B · General Grabber X3
CategorySummerMud-Terrain tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available1156
Rim diameters15″ – 21″16″ – 18″
Tread depth—18 - 21/32″
UTQG—AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering
Max pressure—35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone RoadHawk

General Grabber X3

Winner: General Grabber X3 — better noise, handling and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

General Grabber X3 scores 61 vs 45 on noise.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber X3 scores 58 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber X3 scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber X3 scores 64 vs 59 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone RoadHawk
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber X3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

RoadHawk or Grabber X3?

Which is better in the wet, RoadHawk or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 71 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, RoadHawk or Grabber X3?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, RoadHawk or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 61 vs 45 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, RoadHawk or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 64 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, RoadHawk or Grabber X3?

General Grabber X3, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology