Firestone RoadHawk vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 17 + 33 road tests and 645 + 21,761 owner reviews. How we score
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)
“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”
Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)
“We downsized from 21” stock on GTline to 20” rims and put on the CC2s—can’t stand the ugly stock rims and plastic covers. It got so much quieter that we noticed we could turn the radio down from 6 to 4 on the secondary roads, and down from 8 to 5 on the highway. Efficiency improved slightly, possibly due to lighter weight wheels.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
67
Dry
CrossClimate 2 +28
95
Why this score
Source
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / 31 tests
82
99
Reviews found online
44
88
RoadHawk:60% × 82.2 + 40% × 44.4 = 67
CrossClimate 2:60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95
64
Wet
CrossClimate 2 +23
87
Why this score
Source
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 31 tests
76
83
Reviews found online
47
92
RoadHawk:60% × 76.3 + 40% × 46.8 = 64
CrossClimate 2:60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.8 = 87
–
Snow
No comparison
91
Why this score
Source
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 27 tests
–
99
Reviews found online
–
79
CrossClimate 2:60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.7 = 91
50
Comfort
CrossClimate 2 +29
79
Why this score
Source
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests
67
67
Reviews found online
38
86
RoadHawk:40% × 67.1 + 60% × 38.3 = 50
CrossClimate 2:40% × 67.1 + 60% × 86.1 = 79
45
Noise
CrossClimate 2 +34
79
Why this score
Source
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 20 tests
31
77
Reviews found online
≈ 66 (est.)
83
RoadHawk:60% × 30.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 45
CrossClimate 2:60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.5 = 79
No owner ratings of noise for RoadHawk. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
50
Treadwear
CrossClimate 2 +34
84
Why this score
Source
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 7 tests
64
81
Reviews found online
28
88
RoadHawk:60% × 64.3 + 40% × 28.3 = 50
CrossClimate 2:60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84
34
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate 2 +48
82
Why this score
Source
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Reviews found online
34
82
72
Efficiency
CrossClimate 2 +18
90
Why this score
Source
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 23 tests
72
90
Scores at a glance
Firestone RoadHawk vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Firestone RoadHawk
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score
56
87
Dry
67
95
Wet
64
87
Snow
–
91
Comfort
50
79
Noise
45
79
Treadwear
50
84
Handling (owners)
34
82
Efficiency
72
90
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
± 6
RoadHawk
87
/ 100
± 4
CrossClimate 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
Discipline
Category
RoadHawk
CrossClimate 2
Δ
Head-to-head
Dry Braking
Dry
97%#11/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview
100%#2/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
100%#5/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
98%#4/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4
–
Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark)
Dry
83%#7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
100%#1/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning
Wet
92%#8/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
90%#9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning
Wet
98%#4/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
93%#9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Wet Braking
Wet
90%#13/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview
92%#9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Wet Braking (concrete)
Wet
87%#29/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
94%#10/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
99%#3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
93%#5/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4
–
Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark)
Wet
27%#15/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
83%#8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark)
Comfort
88%#12/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
95%#4/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16
–
Different tests
Noise
Noise
97%#20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
98%#9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Abrasion
Treadwear
51%#9/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
100%#1/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Wear
Treadwear
66%#6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
95%#4/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Fuel Consumption
Efficiency
93%#47/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
98%#2/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15
–
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
98%#4/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
100%#1/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4
–
Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price
Cost
58%#14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test
55%#12/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership
Cost
#3/202024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
#3/152024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Value
Cost
74%#7/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test
47%#14/15 · 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test
–
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
#12/552024 Summer Tyre Market Overview
#2/62026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17
–
Different tests
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A RoadHawk
Pros
Exceptional wet weather performance, particularly in standing water and heavy rain
Strong dry grip and confident cornering for daily driving
Comfortable ride quality with good bump absorption
Cons
Accelerated and sometimes uneven tread wear, resulting in shorter-than-expected lifespan
Soft sidewalls that can cause a visual 'under-inflated' bulge and spongy cornering response
Limited steering feedback and precision during spirited driving
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Firestone RoadHawk
Mixed
Community discussions reflect mixed perspectives on the Firestone Roadhawk, noting reasonable reviews alongside concerns regarding tread wear. While some test results place it competitively among budget-friendly summer options, owners also discuss practical issues such as unusual noises, generational replacement difficulties, and overall value.
The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design
Based on 762 community posts
Specs side by side
Attribute
A · Firestone RoadHawk
B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
Category
Summer
All Season
Vehicle type
Passenger Car / Crossover
Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available
115
92
Rim diameters
15″ – 21″
15″ – 21″
Tread depth
—
9 - 10/32″
UTQG
—
640 B A
Treadwear warranty
—
60,000 mi
Sidewall
—
Black Side Wall
Max pressure
—
50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common
63
63
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Firestone RoadHawk
87
/ 100
Michelin CrossClimate 2
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better handling, noise and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire BYou enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 34 on handling.
Pick tire BYou want a quieter cabin
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 79 vs 45 on noise.
Pick tire BYou want the longest tread life
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 50 on treadwear.
Pick tire BYou want the most comfortable ride
Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 79 vs 50 on comfort.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology