Head-to-head Updated

Firestone RoadHawk vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 17 + 33 road tests and 645 + 21,761 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–56

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone RoadHawk
Tire AFirestone

RoadHawk

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 17 tests Owners 39 · 645 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (wet handling)

“sind diese Sommerreifen noch okay? Im August 2023 gekauft und circa 25 tausend km gefahren. Firestone Roadhawk, DOT 4922. Habe an meinem Opel Meriva beim Anfahren nach links, zB beim Ausparken oder beim Anfahren in einer engen Linkskurve von vorne rechts ein mehrmaliges Poltern gehört. Habe ein bisschen gegoogelt und von ausgeschlagenem Querlenker gelesen. Im Oktober 2022 hat das Auto einen neuen Vorderachsträger und neue Querlenker bekommen. Nun habe ich Winterräder montiert und das Poltern beim Anfahren nach links ist weg. Was kann das sein? Read more”

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 33 tests Owners 87 · 21,761 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“We downsized from 21” stock on GTline to 20” rims and put on the CC2s—can’t stand the ugly stock rims and plastic covers. It got so much quieter that we noticed we could turn the radio down from 6 to 4 on the secondary roads, and down from 8 to 5 on the highway. Efficiency improved slightly, possibly due to lighter weight wheels.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +28
    95
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 16 / 31 tests8299
    Reviews found online4488

    RoadHawk: 60% × 82.2 + 40% × 44.4 = 67

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.2 + 40% × 88.3 = 95

  2. 64

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +23
    87
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 17 / 31 tests7683
    Reviews found online4792

    RoadHawk: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 46.8 = 64

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.1 + 40% × 91.8 = 87

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    91
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 27 tests–99
    Reviews found online–79

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.6 + 40% × 78.7 = 91

  4. 50

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +29
    79
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 4 tests6767
    Reviews found online3886

    RoadHawk: 40% × 67.1 + 60% × 38.3 = 50

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 67.1 + 60% × 86.1 = 79

  5. 45

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +34
    79
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 20 tests3177
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)83

    RoadHawk: 60% × 30.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 45

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 82.5 = 79

    No owner ratings of noise for RoadHawk. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +34
    84
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / 7 tests6481
    Reviews found online2888

    RoadHawk: 60% × 64.3 + 40% × 28.3 = 50

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84

  7. 34

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +48
    82
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkCrossClimate 2
    Reviews found online3482
  8. 72

    Efficiency

    CrossClimate 2 +18
    90
    Why this score
    SourceRoadHawkCrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / 23 tests7290
Scores at a glance
Firestone RoadHawk vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFirestone RoadHawkMichelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score 56 87
Dry 67 95
Wet 64 87
Snow – 91
Comfort 50 79
Noise 45 79
Treadwear 50 84
Handling (owners) 34 82
Efficiency 72 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

RoadHawk

± 4

CrossClimate 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryRoadHawkCrossClimate 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 97% #11/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview 100% #2/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 100% #5/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 98% #4/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4 – Different tests
Dry Handling (tester's mark) Dry 83% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Curved Aquaplaning Wet 92% #8/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 90% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Straight Aquaplaning Wet 98% #4/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 93% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 90% #13/55 · 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview 92% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Braking (concrete) Wet 87% #29/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 94% #10/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 99% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 93% #5/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4 – Different tests
Wet Handling (tester's mark) Wet 27% #15/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 83% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Comfort (tester's mark) Comfort 88% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 95% #4/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Noise Noise 97% #20/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 98% #9/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Abrasion Treadwear 51% #9/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Wear Treadwear 66% #6/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 95% #4/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Fuel Consumption Efficiency 93% #47/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 98% #2/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 98% #4/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/5 · 2026 TUV Test Report Goodyear Vector All Season 4 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Price Cost 58% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Summer Tyre Test 55% #12/12 · 2024 Minivan / SUV All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership Cost #3/20 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test #3/15 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Value Cost 74% #7/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test 47% #14/15 · 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test – Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall #12/55 2024 Summer Tyre Market Overview #2/6 2026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A RoadHawk

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance, particularly in standing water and heavy rain
  • Strong dry grip and confident cornering for daily driving
  • Comfortable ride quality with good bump absorption

Cons

  • Accelerated and sometimes uneven tread wear, resulting in shorter-than-expected lifespan
  • Soft sidewalls that can cause a visual 'under-inflated' bulge and spongy cornering response
  • Limited steering feedback and precision during spirited driving
All owner themes in the RoadHawk review

Tire B CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Firestone RoadHawk

Mixed

Community discussions reflect mixed perspectives on the Firestone Roadhawk, noting reasonable reviews alongside concerns regarding tread wear. While some test results place it competitively among budget-friendly summer options, owners also discuss practical issues such as unusual noises, generational replacement difficulties, and overall value.

Top themes
#tread wear concerns#budget tire test results#replacement availability issues#generation differences#driving noise symptoms

Based on 5 community posts

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

teslamotorsclub.com ·3 upvotes ·2024-04-28

“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”

r/TeslaModel3 ·2 upvotes ·2025-11-20

“I live in Vancouver,WA and the CC2 are great for our climate even the light snowfall. I have an SR+, so they’re the 18” version. I have about 22K miles on them after 2 years and have averaged 240Wh/mi since installation, and I don’t drive conservatively. They did increase power usage by about 15-20Wh/mi. I’ve also been lazy and haven’t rotated them and they still are wearing very well. Got about 8/32nd up front and 6/32 in rear. Much better than the stock tires that were almost worn out at 22K. Note that places like Costco will not install these on your Tesla because they don’t meet the factory speed rating. It’s a CYA thing.”

r/Ioniq5 ·2 upvotes ·2025-07-26

“I got my new to me 2022 Ultimate RWD in May this year, the tyres were all crap so I went to CrossClimate 2s on all 4 wheels. I can’t tell you what it was doing beforehand but I get 3.7mi/kWh around town and 3.2mi/kWh on the motorway now. I have a fairly heavy right foot, but at 100% charge it shows 270ish miles but mine is an early 72kWh battery so bear that in mind.”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Firestone RoadHawk B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available11592
Rim diameters15″ – 21″15″ – 21″
Tread depth—9 - 10/32″
UTQG—640 B A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common6363

Which one should you actually buy?

Firestone RoadHawk

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better handling, noise and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 82 vs 34 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 79 vs 45 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 79 vs 50 on comfort.

Tire A · Firestone RoadHawk
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

RoadHawk or CrossClimate 2?

Which is better in the wet, RoadHawk or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 87 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, RoadHawk or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, RoadHawk or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 45 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, RoadHawk or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 79 vs 50 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, RoadHawk or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, RoadHawk or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 90 vs 72 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology