Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 24 reviews
Firestone TZ300A vs Nexen N Fera SU4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
N Fera SU4 is ahead, 74–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 80 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
N Fera SU4 +1076Why this score
Source TZ300A N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 65 80 -
71
Wet
N Fera SU4 +778Why this score
Source TZ300A N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 71 80 -
67
Comfort
N Fera SU4 +673Why this score
Source TZ300A N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 64 77 -
66
Treadwear
N Fera SU4 +268Why this score
Source TZ300A N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 66 70 -
67
Handling
N Fera SU4 +976Why this score
Source TZ300A N Fera SU4 Reviews found online 67 76
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone TZ300A | Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 74 |
| Dry | 66 | 76 |
| Wet | 71 | 78 |
| Comfort | 67 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 68 |
| Handling | 67 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
TZ300A
N Fera SU4
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A TZ300A
Pros
- Excellent tread life and overall longevity
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- High value-for-money proposition
Cons
- Inconsistent road noise levels, with some users reporting intrusive drone
- Variable wet-weather performance and occasional aquaplaning concerns
- Lack of steering feedback or 'wallowy' feel on certain vehicle setups
Tire B N Fera SU4
Pros
- Outstanding value for money compared to major premium brands
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Reliable and predictable grip in both dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can lead to less precise steering feedback and body roll during aggressive cornering
- Average or faster-than-expected treadwear for some driving styles
- Can become harder and noisier as the tire ages or wears down
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone TZ300A | B · Nexen N Fera SU4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone TZ300A
Nexen N Fera SU4
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU4 — better dry, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 66 on dry.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 76 vs 67 on handling.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 78 vs 71 on wet.
Nexen N Fera SU4 scores 73 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.