tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Altimax Arctic vs Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 32 + 1 owner reviews. How we score

Winter i cept evo2 SUV is ahead, 71–59

Check price on Amazon · Winter i cept evo2 SUV or Altimax Arctic on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Tire BHankook

Winter i cept evo2 SUV

Winter

Provisional

Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 71 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 57

    Dry

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV +13
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticWinter i cept evo2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)69
    Reviews found online5171

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 57

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 68.6 + 40% × 71 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 62

    Wet

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV +8
    70
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticWinter i cept evo2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6069

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 62

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 70.5 + 40% × 68.9 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 59

    Snow

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV +16
    75
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticWinter i cept evo2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 64 (est.)74
    Reviews found online5277

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 59

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 77.1 = 75

    No road tests of snow for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV +11
    71
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticWinter i cept evo2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)72
    Reviews found online5169

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 60

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 72.3 + 40% × 68.5 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticWinter i cept evo2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)71
    Reviews found online54≈ 67 (est.)

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 69

    No road tests of noise for Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Winter i cept evo2 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV +11
    68
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticWinter i cept evo2 SUV
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5071

    Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 57

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Winter i cept evo2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    Winter i cept evo2 SUV +20
    69
    Why this score
    SourceAltimax ArcticWinter i cept evo2 SUV
    Reviews found online4969
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Altimax ArcticHankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Relative Score 59 71
Dry 57 70
Wet 62 70
Snow 59 75
Comfort 60 71
Noise 62 69
Treadwear 57 68
Handling (owners) 49 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Altimax Arctic

Winter i cept evo2 SUV

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Altimax Arctic

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, slush, and ice
  • High value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Reliable wet and dry handling during cold weather months

Cons

  • Handling and responsiveness drop off compared to dedicated summer or all-season tires
  • Some users report accelerated wear once the tire reaches 50% tread life
  • Minor tendencies toward understeer during hard cornering
All owner themes in the Altimax Arctic review

Tire B Winter i cept evo2 SUV

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Altimax Arctic B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV
CategoryWinter Touring tiresWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available144
Rim diameters17″15″ – 23″

Which one should you actually buy?

General Altimax Arctic

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV

Winner: Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV — better handling, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 69 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 75 vs 59 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 70 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV scores 71 vs 60 on comfort.

Tire A · General Altimax Arctic
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Altimax Arctic or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?

Which is better in the wet, Altimax Arctic or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 70 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Altimax Arctic or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 70 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Altimax Arctic or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 75 vs 59 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Altimax Arctic or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 69 vs 62 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Altimax Arctic or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 71 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Altimax Arctic or Winter i cept evo2 SUV?

Hankook Winter i cept evo2 SUV, 68 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology