Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 32 reviews
General Altimax Arctic vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 32 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
Crugen HT51 is ahead, 72–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Crugen HT51 +1673Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 51 77 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 57
Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73
No road tests of dry for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
Crugen HT51 +1375Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 60 77 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 62
Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75
No road tests of wet for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
59
Snow
Crugen HT51 +1170Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 52 70 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 59
Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70
No road tests of snow for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
60
Comfort
Crugen HT51 +1171Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 51 72 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 60
Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
Crugen HT51 +1072Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 54 78 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62
Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72
No road tests of noise for Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
Crugen HT51 +764Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Crugen HT51 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 58 Reviews found online 50 74 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 57
Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Crugen HT51 +2675Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Crugen HT51 Reviews found online 49 75
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Altimax Arctic | Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 72 |
| Dry | 57 | 73 |
| Wet | 62 | 75 |
| Snow | 59 | 70 |
| Comfort | 60 | 71 |
| Noise | 62 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Altimax Arctic
Crugen HT51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Altimax Arctic
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, slush, and ice
- High value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
- Reliable wet and dry handling during cold weather months
Cons
- Handling and responsiveness drop off compared to dedicated summer or all-season tires
- Some users report accelerated wear once the tire reaches 50% tread life
- Minor tendencies toward understeer during hard cornering
Tire B Crugen HT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
- Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction
Cons
- Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
- Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
- Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Altimax Arctic | B · Kumho Crugen HT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Touring tires | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 44 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 12.5/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 720 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Altimax Arctic
Kumho Crugen HT51
Winner: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 49 on handling.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 73 vs 57 on dry.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 62 on wet.
Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 70 vs 59 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51?
Which is better in the wet, Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 75 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 73 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 70 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Altimax Arctic or Crugen HT51?
Kumho Crugen HT51, 64 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology