Tests – · none yet Owners 53 · 32 reviews
General Altimax Arctic vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 32 + 1,627 owner reviews. How we score
Geolandar A/T G015 is ahead, 73–59
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 1,627 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)
“I put the G015 ’s on y wife’s 2020 this spring but in 225/65r17. Saved the stock wheels for snow tires . No complaints with the tires . They are super quiet. Handle fine.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
57
Dry
Geolandar A/T G015 +1875Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 51 76 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.5 = 57
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 73.4 + 40% × 76.3 = 75
No road tests of dry for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
62
Wet
Geolandar A/T G015 +1072Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 60 78 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59.8 = 62
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 68.9 + 40% × 77.5 = 72
No road tests of wet for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
59
Snow
Geolandar A/T G015 +1574Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 52 71 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 59
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 76.3 + 40% × 71.3 = 74
No road tests of snow for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
60
Comfort
Geolandar A/T G015 +1373Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 51 76 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 66 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 60
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 76 = 73
No road tests of comfort for Altimax Arctic or Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Noise
Geolandar A/T G015 +1476Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 54 77 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 76.5 = 76
No road tests of noise for Altimax Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
Geolandar A/T G015 +1370Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Geolandar A/T G015 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 50 73 Altimax Arctic: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 57
Geolandar A/T G015: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Altimax Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Geolandar A/T G015. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Geolandar A/T G015 +2574Why this score
Source Altimax Arctic Geolandar A/T G015 Reviews found online 49 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Altimax Arctic | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 59 | 73 |
| Dry | 57 | 75 |
| Wet | 62 | 72 |
| Snow | 59 | 74 |
| Comfort | 60 | 73 |
| Noise | 62 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Altimax Arctic
Geolandar A/T G015
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Altimax Arctic
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, slush, and ice
- High value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
- Reliable wet and dry handling during cold weather months
Cons
- Handling and responsiveness drop off compared to dedicated summer or all-season tires
- Some users report accelerated wear once the tire reaches 50% tread life
- Minor tendencies toward understeer during hard cornering
Tire B Geolandar A/T G015
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather and rain traction
- Low road noise and smooth highway ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and winter conditions (3PMSF rated)
Cons
- Struggles in deep, sticky mud and wet clay
- Some reports of faster tread wear or hardening rubber compound over time
- Softer sidewalls on certain specs can result in a slightly floaty or numb steering feel under heavy loads
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
General Altimax Arctic
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
“I may up the pressure to your suggestion - I'm running the door jamb recommended 39 PSI all around. I pick up little pebbles in the tread all day, every day, I notice. I have noticed a ~2 mpg loss on fuel economy, which really adds a lot to the "price" of the tires. Are you seeing any worse MPGs?”
“Changing tires (General Grabber AT3 vs Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015) Halloo I am about to pick my RR next month from the dealer and I am thinking if it is a good idea to change tires. Here is the context: I am buying the RR because I always wanted to drive a truck and I love American cars in general (I also have Mustang s197 V8). In fact I want to switch from Wrangler Sahara, which is a great car BTW, however after 4 years and only 20.000 miles I know I miss more comfort. The rest of my family even more ;-) 95% of my trips is on reagular roads, city cruising. Sometimes some rural paths (no heavy offroading). My Wrangler came with Duelers, which I replaced with Yokohama A/T G015. The difference was night and day as far as wet and cold. Here in POLAND we have two seasons: it is either hot and wet or cold and wet. Winter in my area is pretty light, however I go to the mountains once a year. So the question is: As I do not know how General Grabber AT3 works, but I trust Yokohoma G015, is the change the tires worth it?”
“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”
Based on 30 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Altimax Arctic | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Touring tires | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 1 | 90 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 - 600 A B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 35 - 80 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Altimax Arctic
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better handling, dry and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 49 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 75 vs 57 on dry.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 59 on snow.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 76 vs 62 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Altimax Arctic or Geolandar A/T G015?
Which is better in the wet, Altimax Arctic or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 72 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Altimax Arctic or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 75 vs 57 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Altimax Arctic or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 74 vs 59 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Altimax Arctic or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 76 vs 62 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Altimax Arctic or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 73 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Altimax Arctic or Geolandar A/T G015?
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015, 70 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology