tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber APT vs General Grabber A/TX — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 82 + 373 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Grabber APT and Grabber A/TX are level at 68.

Check price on Amazon · Grabber APT Check price on Amazon · Grabber A/TX
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber APT
Tire AGeneral

Grabber APT

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 67 · 82 reviews

Best test result: #5 of 18 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Terrain Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

General Grabber A/TX
Tire BGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 373 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Grabber A/TX +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6768

    Grabber APT: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Grabber APT +1
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7574

    Grabber APT: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74 = 73

    No road tests of wet for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    Grabber A/TX +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6467

    Grabber APT: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 67

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 68

    No road tests of snow for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Grabber APT +2
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6058

    Grabber APT: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 60.1 = 63

    Grabber A/TX: 40% × 66.6 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber APT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 61

    Noise

    Grabber A/TX +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5360

    Grabber APT: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.5 = 61

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber APT or Grabber A/TX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 70

    Treadwear

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/TX
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests71≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6972

    Grabber APT: 60% × 71.1 + 40% × 68.6 = 70

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.4 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 57

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber A/TX +2
    59
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber APTGrabber A/TX
    Reviews found online5759
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber APTGeneral Grabber A/TX
Relative Score 68 68
Dry 67 68
Wet 74 73
Snow 67 68
Comfort 63 61
Noise 61 64
Treadwear 70 70
Handling (owners) 57 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber APT

± 7

Grabber A/TX

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber APT

Pros

  • Excellent traction in wet, snowy, and light off-road conditions
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an all-terrain tire
  • Attractive, rugged aesthetic that enhances vehicle appearance

Cons

  • Difficulty in achieving proper wheel balance, leading to vibrations
  • Inconsistent tread life reports, with some users experiencing premature wear
  • Tendency to pick up and retain gravel in tread grooves
All owner themes in the Grabber APT review

Tire B Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber APT

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

ram-trx.com ·2025-10-03

“I've got just over 10,000 miles on my General Grabber A/Tx's and I love them. For the terrain I cover, they are great. If you're looking for a mud tire, these aren't going to clean out very well (probably similar to an average A/T like a BFG KO2). But in the deep snow and ice, they've been great. They are also amazingly quiet on the highway, and on loose dirt/gravel they have done really well. I don't have enough miles to tell you how long they will last, but going off how they are wearing right now, I'm optimistic I can get 40,000 miles out of them (I rotate my tires every 4,000 miles).”
r/Crosstrek ·12 upvotes ·2025-04-12

“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
r/4Runner ·16 upvotes ·2020-10-11

“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber APT B · General Grabber A/TX
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available2544
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 22″
Tread depth12 - 16/32″14 - 17/32″
UTQG360 - 740 A - AA A - B640 A A - B
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlack Side Wall - Raised White Lettering
Max pressure44 - 90 psi35 - 80 psi
Sizes in common1818

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber APT

General Grabber A/TX

Too close to call: General Grabber APT and General Grabber A/TX are within 2 points overall. General Grabber A/TX is stronger on noise.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

General Grabber A/TX scores 64 vs 61 on noise.

Tire A · General Grabber APT
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber APT or Grabber A/TX?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber APT or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 74 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber APT or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Grabber APT or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Grabber APT or Grabber A/TX?

General Grabber A/TX, 64 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber APT or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Grabber APT or Grabber A/TX?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology