Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber AT2 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 86 + 154 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Grabber AT2 and Road Venture AT51 are level at 67.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber AT2
Tire AGeneral

Grabber AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Road Venture AT51 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6568

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Road Venture AT51 +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6070

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 71

    Snow

    Grabber AT2 +1
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7170

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    Grabber AT2 +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7063

    Grabber AT2: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69

    Road Venture AT51: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 63.3 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    Level
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6159

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 73

    Treadwear

    Grabber AT2 +12
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Road Venture AT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7758

    Grabber AT2: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 73

    Road Venture AT51: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Road Venture AT51 +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT2Road Venture AT51
    Reviews found online6263
Scores at a glance
General Grabber AT2 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber AT2Kumho Road Venture AT51
Relative Score 67 67
Dry 66 68
Wet 63 70
Snow 71 70
Comfort 69 65
Noise 64 64
Treadwear 73 61
Handling (owners) 62 63

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber AT2

± 7

Road Venture AT51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber AT2

Pros

  • Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
  • Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
  • Long-lasting tread life and durability

Cons

  • Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
  • Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
  • Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
All owner themes in the Grabber AT2 review

Tire B Road Venture AT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
  • Impressive traction and confidence in snow and winter conditions
  • Quiet and smooth highway ride with minimal road noise for an all-terrain tire

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users under heavy or everyday use
  • Poor self-cleaning capabilities in deep or heavy mud
  • Reduced wet traction and potential slippage when the tread wears low
All owner themes in the Road Venture AT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber AT2 B · Kumho Road Venture AT51
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available210
Rim diameters16″15″ – 18″
Tread depth14/32″13.5/32″
UTQG640 A B540 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi55,000 mi
SidewallOutlined White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi65 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber AT2

Kumho Road Venture AT51

Too close to call: General Grabber AT2 and Kumho Road Venture AT51 are within 2 points overall. General Grabber AT2 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Kumho Road Venture AT51 is stronger on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber AT2 scores 73 vs 61 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 70 vs 63 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber AT2 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.

Tire A · General Grabber AT2
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture AT51

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?

Kumho Road Venture AT51, 70 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?

General Grabber AT2, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?

General Grabber AT2, 73 vs 61 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology