Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews
General Grabber AT2 vs Kumho Road Venture AT51 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 86 + 154 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Grabber AT2 and Road Venture AT51 are level at 67.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 154 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
Road Venture AT51 +268Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Road Venture AT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 65 68 Grabber AT2: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
Road Venture AT51: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.7 = 68
No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
63
Wet
Road Venture AT51 +770Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Road Venture AT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 60 70 Grabber AT2: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 63
Road Venture AT51: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
71
Snow
Grabber AT2 +170Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Road Venture AT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 70 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 71
Road Venture AT51: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
69
Comfort
Grabber AT2 +465Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Road Venture AT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 70 63 Grabber AT2: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69
Road Venture AT51: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 63.3 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
Level64Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Road Venture AT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 61 59 Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 64
Road Venture AT51: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64
No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
73
Treadwear
Grabber AT2 +1261Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Road Venture AT51 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 77 58 Grabber AT2: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 73
Road Venture AT51: 60% × 63.3 (est.) + 40% × 58.1 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Road Venture AT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Road Venture AT51 +163Why this score
Source Grabber AT2 Road Venture AT51 Reviews found online 62 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber AT2 | Kumho Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 67 |
| Dry | 66 | 68 |
| Wet | 63 | 70 |
| Snow | 71 | 70 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Noise | 64 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 73 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber AT2
Road Venture AT51
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber AT2
Pros
- Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
- Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
- Long-lasting tread life and durability
Cons
- Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
- Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
- Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
Tire B Road Venture AT51
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordable price point compared to premium competitors
- Impressive traction and confidence in snow and winter conditions
- Quiet and smooth highway ride with minimal road noise for an all-terrain tire
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some users under heavy or everyday use
- Poor self-cleaning capabilities in deep or heavy mud
- Reduced wet traction and potential slippage when the tread wears low
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber AT2 | B · Kumho Road Venture AT51 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 2 | 10 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 14/32″ | 13.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A B | 540 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 60,000 mi | 55,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Outlined White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 65 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Grabber AT2
Kumho Road Venture AT51
Too close to call: General Grabber AT2 and Kumho Road Venture AT51 are within 2 points overall. General Grabber AT2 is stronger on treadwear and comfort. Kumho Road Venture AT51 is stronger on wet.
General Grabber AT2 scores 73 vs 61 on treadwear.
Kumho Road Venture AT51 scores 70 vs 63 on wet.
General Grabber AT2 scores 69 vs 65 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?
Kumho Road Venture AT51, 70 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 68 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 64 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?
General Grabber AT2, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber AT2 or Road Venture AT51?
General Grabber AT2, 73 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology