Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Head-to-head
Updated
Hankook Dynapro AT2 vs General Grabber AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 218 + 86 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber AT2 is ahead, 67–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 86 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
Grabber AT2 +1066Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 50 65 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
Grabber AT2 +563Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 54 60 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.8 = 58
Grabber AT2: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
61
Snow
Grabber AT2 +1071Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 55 71 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61
Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 71
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
53
Comfort
Grabber AT2 +1669Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 45 69 Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 53
Grabber AT2: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 69 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison64Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 60 Grabber AT2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 64
No road tests of noise for Grabber AT2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
55
Treadwear
Grabber AT2 +1873Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Grabber AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 48 78 Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
Grabber AT2: 60% × 70.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 73
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
47
Handling (owners)
Grabber AT2 +1461Why this score
Source Dynapro AT2 Grabber AT2 Reviews found online 47 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Dynapro AT2 | General Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 67 |
| Dry | 56 | 66 |
| Wet | 58 | 63 |
| Snow | 61 | 71 |
| Comfort | 53 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 64 |
| Treadwear | 55 | 73 |
| Handling (owners) | 47 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
56
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
67
/ 100
Grabber AT2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
Tire B Grabber AT2
Pros
- Excellent off-road grip in mud, sand, and dirt
- Impressively low road noise for an aggressive all-terrain tread pattern
- Long-lasting tread life and durability
Cons
- Subpar or dangerous wet-weather and wet-tarmac grip reported by some users
- Thin sidewalls susceptible to punctures from sharp rocks during serious off-roading
- Tendency for some tires to go out of shape or cup over time, causing increased noise
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Summers22 Any real world experience with these? They sure seem to get a lot better reviews than their predecessor, the Hankook Dynapro ATM RF10. I am considering them as the price on Falken Wildpeak AT3 has gone insane. There is over $300 difference in the 275/60/20 size. The few reviews I have seen for the new version Hankook are very positive. Thanks I just bought a 2020 f150 with 24000 miles. I am immediately getting rid of the Dynapro at2s. They drive like they are covered in grease. On a dry day trying to pull away from a stop sign/light they spin. On wet roads they spin. We recently had a dusting of snow (it was melted by the afternoon) The tires lost traction of curves going slowly and would not catch grip to stop. These tires are dangerous.”
r/TyreReviews
·1 upvote ·2023-03-21
“I just got the extreme at2 and they are awesome and quiet. Did go on an easy/moderate off-road in Broken Bow, OK and they did outstanding!”
r/f150
·1 upvote ·2024-03-23
“I had the Dynapro AT2’s on my Lightning and they’re ok. I’d say they’re excellent dry, ok wet and in mud, marginal in snow. When I was looking for new tires I wanted an All Terrain that was slightly more aggressive for off-road and Three-Peak snow rated. But, with the Lightning, they couldn’t be a heavy tire as it would hurt range. Ended up settling on the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme. Essentially this is the newer version of the AT2. I’ve got about 10,000 miles on them so far and I’ll say dry handling is a little worse than the old AT2 (probably due to the more aggressive lugs), wet handling is about the same, but mud and snow handling is noticeably improved. So all in all, I probably wouldn’t get the AT2 again but I would do the AT2 Xtreme again.”
Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability
Based on 47 community posts
Tire B
General Grabber AT2
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Dynapro AT2 | B · General Grabber AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 33 | 2 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 20″ | 16″ |
| Tread depth | — | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 440 - 660 A A - B | 640 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 60,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Outlined White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
56
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
67
/ 100
General Grabber AT2
Winner: General Grabber AT2 — better treadwear, comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber AT2 scores 73 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber AT2 scores 69 vs 53 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber AT2 scores 61 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber AT2 scores 66 vs 56 on dry.
Tire A · Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire B · General Grabber AT2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Dynapro AT2 or Grabber AT2?
Which is better in the wet, Dynapro AT2 or Grabber AT2?
General Grabber AT2, 63 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Dynapro AT2 or Grabber AT2?
General Grabber AT2, 66 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Dynapro AT2 or Grabber AT2?
General Grabber AT2, 71 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Dynapro AT2 or Grabber AT2?
General Grabber AT2, 69 vs 53 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Dynapro AT2 or Grabber AT2?
General Grabber AT2, 73 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology