tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber A/T vs General Grabber AT3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 17 + 251 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber AT3 is ahead, 73–64

Check price on Amazon · Grabber AT3 or Grabber A/T on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/T
Tire AGeneral

Grabber A/T

All-Terrain tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 17 reviews

General Grabber AT3
Tire BGeneral

Grabber AT3

All-Terrain tire

± 7

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 78 · 251 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)

“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Grabber AT3 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)66
    Reviews found online6278

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 78.4 = 71

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 66

    Wet

    Grabber AT3 +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)68
    Reviews found online6478

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 66

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Snow

    Grabber AT3 +11
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)77
    Reviews found online6073

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 64

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 73.2 = 75

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Grabber AT3 +12
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6078

    Grabber A/T: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63

    Grabber AT3: 40% × 70.7 (est.) + 60% × 78 = 75

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/T or Grabber AT3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–76
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.8 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Grabber AT3 +11
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6381

    Grabber A/T: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 64

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.4 = 75

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber AT3 +11
    74
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TGrabber AT3
    Reviews found online6374
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    53
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TGrabber AT3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–53
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber A/TGeneral Grabber AT3
Relative Score 64 73
Dry 64 71
Wet 66 72
Snow 64 75
Comfort 63 75
Noise – 72
Treadwear 64 75
Handling (owners) 63 74
Efficiency – 53

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Grabber A/T

± 7

Grabber AT3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber A/T

Pros

  • Excellent off-road traction on mud, grass, gravel, and farm tracks
  • Good performance in snow and winter conditions
  • Reasonably quiet and smooth on-road manners compared to more aggressive alternatives

Cons

  • Poor or slippery grip on wet tarmac, raising safety concerns for some users
  • Balancing issues reported by multiple owners
  • Weak sidewall durability or vulnerability to punctures on low-profile applications
All owner themes in the Grabber A/T review

Tire B Grabber AT3

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
  • Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
  • Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
  • Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
All owner themes in the Grabber AT3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber A/T

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber AT3

Positive

Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.

r/Audi ·6 upvotes ·2024-04-13

“I feel not many people in this group will like this but I'll post for the hell of it. Some 215/60/17 general grabber at3 I fitted to my A4 to test if it would fit from the standard 225/50/17”
r/4Runner ·2 upvotes ·2021-04-11

“I have ran the cooper at3 and they are great for a mostly highway tire. I just put the grabber a/tx on but don't have many miles on them yet, went with then because they are more aggressive than the at3 but not as heavy and crazy like my previous st maxx. I have no experience with falken. For what you need it if you're tires the AT3s will be good, they are not loud. My new generals have a bit more noise.”
audiworld.com

“Only got 32K on them and installed General Grabber AT3. Took a 2000 mile trip and I think the all terrain tires ride better and look bad ***.”
Top themes
#tread life and durability#gravel and off-road performance#ride comfort and low noise#snow and loose terrain grip#tire damage and sidewall integrity#fitment and tire pressure

Based on 20 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber A/T B · General Grabber AT3
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—77
Rim diameters—15″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber A/T

General Grabber AT3

Winner: General Grabber AT3 — better comfort, snow and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. General Grabber A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 63 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 64 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

General Grabber AT3 scores 75 vs 64 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber AT3 scores 74 vs 63 on handling.

Tire A · General Grabber A/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber AT3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber A/T or Grabber AT3?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/T or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 72 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/T or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 71 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber A/T or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 64 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/T or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber A/T or Grabber AT3?

General Grabber AT3, 75 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology