Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 17 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/T vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 218 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/T is ahead, 64–56
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews
“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Grabber A/T +856Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 62 50 Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 61.7 = 64
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
66
Wet
Grabber A/T +858Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 64 54 Grabber A/T: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 66
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 58
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
64
Snow
Grabber A/T +361Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 60 55 Grabber A/T: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
62
Comfort
Grabber A/T +1052Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 59 45 Grabber A/T: 40% × 66.8 (est.) + 60% × 59.3 = 62
Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
Grabber A/T +955Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Dynapro AT2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 63 48 Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 64
Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
63
Handling (owners)
Grabber A/T +1647Why this score
Source Grabber A/T Dynapro AT2 Reviews found online 63 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/T | Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 56 |
| Dry | 64 | 56 |
| Wet | 66 | 58 |
| Snow | 64 | 61 |
| Comfort | 62 | 52 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 55 |
| Handling (owners) | 63 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
Grabber A/T
56
/ 100
Dynapro AT2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/T
Pros
- Excellent off-road traction on mud, grass, gravel, and farm tracks
- Good performance in snow and winter conditions
- Reasonably quiet and smooth on-road manners compared to more aggressive alternatives
Cons
- Poor or slippery grip on wet tarmac, raising safety concerns for some users
- Balancing issues reported by multiple owners
- Weak sidewall durability or vulnerability to punctures on low-profile applications
Tire B Dynapro AT2
Pros
- Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
- Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
- Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
- Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
- Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
General Grabber A/T
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.
f150gen14.com
·2 upvotes ·2025-10-21
“Factory tires are usually worse than what you normally purchase at a tire shop. Have seen it with every new vehicle. (I get a new work vehicle every 3-4 years) If you look up those Dynapro AT2s, you'll see they even have a different tread pattern for the ones that come with new F-150s vs what is reviewed/shown on Tirerack.com They are cheaper, made for mpg, and don't last. I replaced mine on my 2023 at 20K miles. We noticed the same thing on my wife's VW. Came with some lower-end goodyears that were replaced at 15K. Also, tread-wear warranty only applies to defects. If they wear out sooner, that generally isn't covered by any tire brand.”
f150lightningforum.com
·2025-03-08
“I’ve had the Hankook Dynapro AT2s on another truck and their Dynapro AS on my Expedition. Both were terrible, even dangerous. Got rid of them early on both vehicles. My Lightning came with the General Grabbers. The Grabbers are decent, actually handle snow and wet very well, but are worthless for slush and ice. They’re not good on dirt. But I’ve kept them on now for a bit over 2 years. I’ll be replacing them before next winter as it will be about time anyway. Definitely want to go with something a bit more aggressive or winter-capable, just not sure which tires as of yet. Can’t really afford to sacrifice any range… Maybe just a tiny bit is all.”
f150forum.com
“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”
Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability
Based on 47 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/T | B · Hankook Dynapro AT2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 33 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 440 - 660 A A - B |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
General Grabber A/T
56
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro AT2
Winner: General Grabber A/T — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. General Grabber A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
General Grabber A/T scores 63 vs 47 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
General Grabber A/T scores 62 vs 52 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/T scores 64 vs 55 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber A/T scores 64 vs 56 on dry.
Tire A · General Grabber A/T
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/T or Dynapro AT2?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/T or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/T, 66 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/T or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/T, 64 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber A/T or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/T, 64 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/T or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/T, 62 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/T or Dynapro AT2?
General Grabber A/T, 64 vs 55 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology