Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber AT3 vs Hankook Dynapro HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 251 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber AT3 is ahead, 70–64

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber AT3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber AT3

All-Terrain tire

Tests 70 · 2 tests Owners 73 · 251 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 8 in 2018 Auto Bild SUV All Season Tyre Test (noise)

“How long have I got? Grabber at3s, plenty of tread but I’m seeing some cracks forming. Are these something I need to be concerned about imminently or am I safe to continue driving for a few more months?”

Hankook Dynapro HP
Tire BHankook

Dynapro HP

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 7 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Grabber AT3 +7
    62
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests66≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7459

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 66.4 + 40% × 73.8 = 69

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 59 = 62

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Grabber AT3 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7467

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.2 + 40% × 73.9 = 70

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 66.7 = 68

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 74

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77–
    Reviews found online71–

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 76.6 + 40% × 70.8 = 74

  4. 72

    Comfort

    Grabber AT3 +7
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7561

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 72

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.7 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber AT3 or Dynapro HP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 72

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests76–
    Reviews found online≈ 67 (est.)–

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 75.7 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 72

    No owner ratings of noise for Grabber AT3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Grabber AT3 +6
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Dynapro HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7465

    Grabber AT3: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 71

    Dynapro HP: 60% × 65.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber AT3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber AT3 +15
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber AT3Dynapro HP
    Reviews found online7257
Scores at a glance
General Grabber AT3 vs Hankook Dynapro HP: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber AT3Hankook Dynapro HP
Relative Score 70 64
Dry 69 62
Wet 70 68
Snow 74 –
Comfort 72 65
Noise 72 –
Treadwear 71 65
Handling (owners) 72 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber AT3

Dynapro HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber AT3

Pros

  • Exceptionally low road noise for an all-terrain tire, maintaining high highway comfort
  • Strong on-road handling and grip in both dry and wet conditions
  • Reliable light off-road traction, particularly on grass, gravel, dirt tracks, and light mud

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to vulnerability against sharp stones, flints, or tree stumps
  • Subpar performance on compacted snow and ice compared to dedicated winter tires
  • Tread can pack up and struggle in deep, heavy, or extremely soft mud
All owner themes in the Grabber AT3 review

Tire B Dynapro HP

Pros

  • Impressive long-term durability and high mileage potential (up to 68,000 miles reported)
  • Stable performance for motorway travel and holiday towing under normal conditions
  • Consistent and even wear reported over extended periods (e.g., 40,000 km)

Cons

  • Extreme and premature front tire degradation, including uneven wear and a melted appearance at very low mileage
  • Lack of traction on soft or slippery surfaces like wet grass
  • Reduced performance and confidence when towing heavier loads such as a caravan
All owner themes in the Dynapro HP review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber AT3

Positive

Community feedback for the General Grabber AT3 is largely positive, with owners highlighting strong tread longevity, smooth ride comfort, and low road noise. Drivers also appreciate its off-road capability in gravel, mud, and snow, though occasional questions arise regarding sidewall damage, cracking, and tire sizing fitment.

Top themes
#tread life and durability#gravel and off-road performance#ride comfort and low noise#snow and loose terrain grip#tire damage and sidewall integrity#fitment and tire pressure

Based on 20 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro HP

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber AT3 B · Hankook Dynapro HP
CategoryAll-Terrain tireSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available7714
Rim diameters15″ – 22″16″ – 18″
Sizes in common99

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber AT3

Hankook Dynapro HP

Winner: General Grabber AT3 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber AT3 scores 72 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber AT3 scores 69 vs 62 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber AT3 scores 72 vs 65 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber AT3 scores 71 vs 65 on treadwear.

Tire A · General Grabber AT3
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HP

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber AT3 or Dynapro HP?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber AT3 or Dynapro HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber AT3 or Dynapro HP?

General Grabber AT3, 69 vs 62 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber AT3 or Dynapro HP?

General Grabber AT3, 72 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber AT3 or Dynapro HP?

General Grabber AT3, 71 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology