tirewheelguide

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 is discontinued — replaced by Hankook Dynapro HT RH12. Compare Dynapro HT RH12 with Grabber A/TX

Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber A/TX vs Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 370 + 3 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber A/TX is ahead, 69–57

Check price on Amazon · Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber A/TX
Tire AGeneral

Grabber A/TX

All-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews

“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Grabber A/TX +12
    56
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6949

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 49 = 56

    No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    Grabber A/TX +16
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online7553

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 73

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 57

    No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 69

    Snow

    Grabber A/TX +14
    55
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6845

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 55

    No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    Grabber A/TX +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6348

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 65

    Noise

    Grabber A/TX +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6351

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.7 = 61

    No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    Grabber A/TX +9
    60
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AS RH03
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7256

    Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69

    Dynapro AS RH03: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.3 = 60

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AS RH03. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 61

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber A/TX +12
    49
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber A/TXDynapro AS RH03
    Reviews found online6149
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber A/TXHankook Dynapro AS RH03
Relative Score 69 57
Dry 68 56
Wet 73 57
Snow 69 55
Comfort 66 59
Noise 65 61
Treadwear 69 60
Handling (owners) 61 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber A/TX

Dynapro AS RH03

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber A/TX

Pros

  • Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
  • Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
  • Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling

Cons

  • Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
  • Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
  • Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
All owner themes in the Grabber A/TX review

Tire B Dynapro AS RH03

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber A/TX

Positive

Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.

r/Crosstrek ·12 upvotes ·2025-04-12

“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
jeepforum.com ·2021-10-12

“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI

Based on 37 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber A/TX B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth14 - 17/32″14/32″
UTQG640 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure35 - 80 psi80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber A/TX

Hankook Dynapro AS RH03

Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better wet, snow and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Dynapro AS RH03 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber A/TX scores 73 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 55 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 56 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber A/TX scores 61 vs 49 on handling.

Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AS RH03
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03?

General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 57 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03?

General Grabber A/TX, 68 vs 56 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03?

General Grabber A/TX, 69 vs 55 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03?

General Grabber A/TX, 65 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03?

General Grabber A/TX, 66 vs 59 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro AS RH03?

General Grabber A/TX, 69 vs 60 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology