Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/TX vs Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 370 + 910 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/TX leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 65 · 910 reviews
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Grabber A/TX +167Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 67 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
73
Wet
Grabber A/TX +667Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 75 66 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 73
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 67
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Snow
Grabber A/TX +960Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 53 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 52.8 = 60
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
66
Comfort
Dynapro HT RH12 +167Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 63 66 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of comfort for Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Noise
Dynapro HT RH12 +570Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 75 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 70
No road tests of noise for Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +564Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HT RH12 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 64 Reviews found online 72 64 Grabber A/TX: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 69
Dynapro HT RH12: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 64 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/TX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
61
Handling (owners)
Dynapro HT RH12 +465Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Dynapro HT RH12 Reviews found online 61 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 66 |
| Dry | 68 | 67 |
| Wet | 73 | 67 |
| Snow | 69 | 60 |
| Comfort | 66 | 67 |
| Noise | 65 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
66
/ 100
Dynapro HT RH12
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
Tire B Dynapro HT RH12
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
r/Crosstrek
·12 upvotes ·2025-04-12
“Tire recommendations! Current 215/75R-15 GENERAL GRABBER A/TX SL I am going to need new tires and I am wondering if I should buy a different tire than what I currently have. Overall these tires have been great and drive pretty well in the snow in VT and NY. Drive NJ roads year round aswell. Any recommendations?! Much appreciate any advice!! Read more”
jeepforum.com
·2021-10-12
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Community discussions around the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 highlight it primarily as a mid-tier, budget-conscious highway all-season option for trucks and SUVs. Drivers appreciate its quiet ride, stable tracking, and solid grip, though some note a slightly jumpy ride quality. Most mentions revolve around purchase pricing, sizing options, and comparisons to alternative all-terrain or highway tires.
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Bamaman This must be one of the most popular size of tires on the retail tire market. We're talking 100's to pick from. And unfortunately it's a very expensive tire size too. Yes I've noticed they are expensive! Although I realize I am not limited to just what is in stock at my nearest DiscTire, what they have now is interesting - not many in stock right now. They range from the $169 Trailfinder All Terrain, the $206.00 Cooper Discovers ATP II, the $209.00 Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, then a big jump up to the $277.00 Michelin Defender LTX M/S, and the YUGE $293.00 BFG A/T T/A KO2. I need a tire pretty much for road driving only. I do not often go out of town but for instance I've got a 9 hour trip later this month. It snows here in my area maybe..2 weeks / year, and nothing insane. So I don't really even need A/T tires in my opinion. The Hankook Dynapro seems to fit budget and looks like a good road tire. I can't tell which ones are Chinese but, sure, I'd love to avoid that too! Thanks for all the suggestions here.”
r/denverlist
·2025-12-09
“For Sale: 3X Used Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 Tire - 205/75R16C Description: 3 used Hankook Dynapro HT (RH12) highway all-season tire is available. This model is designed for vans, pickups, and sport utility vehicles, combining long treadwear, good ride comfort, and all-season traction. Brand: Hankook Model: Dynapro HT (RH12) Size: 205/75R16C Condition: Used/Part-worn. The tire has been previously used. Features: The tire features a high-grip silica compound for improved wet and dry traction and a reinforced under-tread to prevent internal damage from impacts. Price: $300 Location: South Denver, Metro area delivery for $50 Read more”
ridgelineownersclub.com
·2012-10-28
“I'm having these tires put on right now. I went with the dynapro HT in a 265/65/17”
Top themes
#pricing and affordability#quiet highway ride#wet and dry traction#tire comparisons#ride comfort and stability
Based on 8 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | — |
| Sizes available | 44 | 24 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 14/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 40,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 54 psi |
| Sizes in common | 13 | 13 |
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
66
/ 100
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
Narrow edge: General Grabber A/TX — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 if noise matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber A/TX scores 73 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 64 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12 scores 70 vs 65 on noise.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro HT RH12
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12?
General Grabber A/TX, 73 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12?
General Grabber A/TX, 69 vs 60 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12?
Hankook Dynapro HT RH12, 70 vs 65 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Grabber A/TX or Dynapro HT RH12?
General Grabber A/TX, 69 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology