Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Head-to-head
Updated
General Grabber A/TX vs Kumho Crugen HP71 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Grabber A/TX is ahead, 68–51
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 274 reviews
“I have Kumho Crugen HP71 on my 2022 Peemium they are great and not super expensive. I got them during the Mazda buy 3 get 1 for $1 sale at my local dealership. My Toyos were toast at 36k miles. Been driving on them for 10k miles now. No complaints.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Grabber A/TX +2147Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 69 36 -
74
Wet
Grabber A/TX +2054Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 75 49 -
69
Snow
Grabber A/TX +1257Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 68 48 -
66
Comfort
Grabber A/TX +1155Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 63 40 -
65
Noise
Grabber A/TX +857Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 62 44 -
69
Treadwear
Grabber A/TX +2544Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 72 30 -
61
Handling
Grabber A/TX +655Why this score
Source Grabber A/TX Crugen HP71 Reviews found online 61 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 51 |
| Dry | 68 | 47 |
| Wet | 74 | 54 |
| Snow | 69 | 57 |
| Comfort | 66 | 55 |
| Noise | 65 | 57 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 44 |
| Handling | 61 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
68
/ 100
Grabber A/TX
51
/ 100
Crugen HP71
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber A/TX
Pros
- Exceptional winter and snow traction (3-peak mountain snowflake rated)
- Impressively low road noise and high ride comfort for an aggressive all-terrain tire
- Strong wet and dry road grip with confident handling
Cons
- Noticeable decrease in fuel economy (MPG drop)
- Tread tends to pick up and throw small stones and pebbles
- Mixed reviews on long-term treadwear and longevity
Tire B Crugen HP71
Pros
- Affordable pricing compared to premium tier brands
- Quiet and smooth ride quality when new
- Confident wet-weather traction and performance in heavy rain
Cons
- Significantly premature tread wear and short lifespan for many users
- Developing loud road noise or howling as mileage increases
- Balancing issues and vehicle vibrations
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Positive
General Grabber A/TX
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
f150forum.com
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
jeepforum.com
·2021-10-12
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
r/4Runner
·16 upvotes ·2020-10-11
“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Highway road noise#Standard load availability#Fuel economy impact#Rock retention and throwing#Ride quality and PSI
Based on 37 community posts
Tire B
Mixed
Kumho Crugen HP71
Community sentiment for the Kumho Crugen HP71 (and its EV variant) is mixed, with owners praising its affordability, comfortable ride, and quiet performance on many vehicles. However, a significant number of drivers report disappointingly rapid tread wear—particularly on heavy electric vehicles—as well as occasional noise on coarse surfaces and internal acoustic foam detachment issues.
r/TeslaModelY
·4 upvotes ·2026-06-17
“Tesla model y tire HP71 crugen on tirerack is offering $80 rebate per tire.”
teslamotorsclub.com
·2 upvotes ·2026-02-12
“That is a crazy good price - The TA91 is low $200s wholesale! (Tire shop pricing). And $279.30 retail. (Tire Rack) Grab them while you can. Sometimes Wal Mart beats any price I can get when they're blowing out a specific tire. FWIW we run the Kumho HP71 EV (OE tire) on our EV9 and it's a super quiet tire. I bought it again for the Spring now that the car is actually aligned and won't burn through them.”
r/MechanicAdvice
·2 upvotes ·2019-07-17
“Kumho HP71 vs Continental DWS06 I was planning to get Continentals for $150 each, but then I found these Kumhos for $118 each. The Continentals have a treadwear of 560, whereas the Kumhos have a treadwear of 640. They both have A/A for traction/temp. Is it really worth the extra $128 for brand name if the cheaper ones will outlast them?”
Top themes
#Rapid tread wear#Affordable price value#Cabin noise levels#Ride comfort#EV tire performance#Acoustic foam issues#OEM tire replacement
Based on 51 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · Kumho Crugen HP71 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 9.9/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | 640 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
68
/ 100
General Grabber A/TX
51
/ 100
Kumho Crugen HP71
Winner: General Grabber A/TX — better treadwear, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 44 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
General Grabber A/TX scores 68 vs 47 on dry.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
General Grabber A/TX scores 74 vs 54 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
General Grabber A/TX scores 69 vs 57 on snow.
Tire A · General Grabber A/TX
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HP71
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.