Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Geolandar A/T G015 is ahead, 73–68
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 370 reviews
“275/60r20 General Grabber A/Tx Just thought I'd share what my truck looks like with a slightly larger tire size in case anyone wondered. No level, just stock. Good looking tires in my opinion.”
Tests 72 · 2 tests Owners 75 · 1,624 reviews
“Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 Snow performance. I'm currently running Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015's on my 2013 Subaru XV (WIP) and I live in a semi snowy area and also work in the mountains on construction sites in Japan. My co-workers keep telling me I need dedicated studless (Winter) tires but I had zero Issue with my current tires last year. I got a little stressed out and paranoid about it today when they mentioned it again, yet they have all had slippage on snow with their dedicated tires yet I had zero. Am I over thinking things? My co-workers are asses to be honest, but anyway I've attached some photos of the sort of conditions I drove in with zero trouble, yet they had slippage coming up the hill into the jobsite.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 73 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 76 |
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 68 |
| Reviews found online | 75 | 78 |
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 76 |
| Reviews found online | 68 | 72 |
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 63 | 76 |
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 62 | 76 |
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 73 |
| Source | Grabber A/TX | Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 61 | 74 |
| Category | General Grabber A/TX | Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 73 |
| Dry | 68 | 74 |
| Wet | 74 | 72 |
| Snow | 69 | 74 |
| Comfort | 66 | 73 |
| Noise | 65 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 70 |
| Handling | 61 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber A/TX
Geolandar A/T G015
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment toward the General Grabber A/TX is largely positive, with owners frequently praising its winter traction on snow and ice as well as its quiet highway ride. Buyers appreciate its availability in lighter standard load ratings and competitive pricing compared to rivals like the BFG KO2. Minor drawbacks cited include fuel economy loss with heavier LT versions and a tendency for the tread to pick up and fling gravel rocks.
“Quote: Originally Posted by Teddydogno1 I think I am going to get these for my 2002 SCab FX4. Price and rating both seem very good. How do you like them (those that have them)? Rob I like them a lot. I have about 12000 miles on them. They have a little noise, but not bad if that is a factor for you. I am running them at 38 psi and the ride is a little softer. If I had one complaint, I run a lot of gravel roads and rocks will stick in the tread. When I get up to highway speed the rocks come out and come out hard. I have factory rims so my tires don't stick out beyond the fenders except a tiny bit. I have a couple nice rock chips on the side of my truck from that.”
“Thanks Coldcase, you always come through. Im thinking of going for the General Grabber A/Tx, 1 vehicle from the link you posted is using them and even a bigger size at 285 without any issue, difference is they have the altitude package instead of Overland. Do you think ill be fine?”
“Swapped OEM 265/65R17 for Grabber A/Tx 265/70R17 On 2018 Wheels”
Based on 37 community posts
Community sentiment toward the Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 is predominantly positive, with owners highlighting its quiet highway manners, strong snow and wet traction, and good light off-road capability. Criticisms primarily center around a slight 1–2 mpg fuel economy loss, potential ride harshness or softer P-rated sidewalls depending on vehicle application, and gravel retention in the tread. Many drivers consider it a balanced all-terrain tire suited for predominantly on-road daily driving with occasional trail use.
“GEOLANDAR A/T G015 Anyone running these on 17" rims, stock or other? I have Enkei M52 rims, 17x7.5 and 45mm offset. What size fits without rubbing? 215/60R17 looks to be the closest, the only other size close is 225/65R17 which I think will be too big without a lift. I am open to other suggestions for off-road capable tires that will mainly be used on-road. K02 is out because they don't fit without rubbing, and I plan to add flaps at some point and do not want to lift the vehicle or get different rims.”
“I switched to Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 265/65R18 114H SL BSW Corrected the speedometer (normally it reads under by a few MPH with the factory tires). They are AWESOME in heavy rain conditions and snow. AT tires, so they are slightly louder than the Defenders, but not by much. Slight rub on a hard turn, but you can replace the one bolt in each of the front wheel well trims and it's all better. They look great as well. Good luck!”
“Anyone here running Yokohama Geolandar A/T4 G018's? Any complaints or regrets (road noise, balancing issues, etc.), specifically in SL load? Currently have the Geolandar A/T G015's on my 4th gen and am considering the A/T4's next. All the real feedback (non-commercial reviews) I've been able find on here and other forums seem to be pretty old and mostly by people without a ton of miles on them. My use case is about 90% on road with the remaining 10% on mild to moderate trails. Not a rock crawler and never will be. The G015's in SL load have been pretty perfect but I've been thinking about changing to the A/T4's next for slightly better off road performance. Main concern (aside from weight, which is why I'm looking to stay with SL instead of C) is wet pavement safety since I drive my young kids pretty much daily. I only have a roof rack, so not too much added weight.”
Based on 30 community posts
| Attribute | A · General Grabber A/TX | B · Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 44 | 90 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 14 - 17/32″ | 11 - 18/32″ |
| UTQG | 640 A A - B | 360 - 600 A B |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised White Lettering | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
General Grabber A/TX
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015
Winner: Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 — better handling, noise and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 61 on handling.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 76 vs 65 on noise.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 73 vs 66 on comfort.
Yokohama Geolandar A/T G015 scores 74 vs 68 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.