Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber HTS60 vs Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 493 + 16 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber HTS60 is ahead, 76–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber HTS60
Tire AGeneral

Grabber HTS60

All Season

± 7

Tests – · 1 test Owners 80 · 493 reviews

Best test result: #3 of 13 in 2022 Consumer Reports All Season Truck Tires (tested tread life (miles))

“Can’t speak for the specific iron man tires you’re looking at, but Carmax put a set of iMpve Gen 2 AS tires on our 300 when we bought it. In dry weather they were fine, wet they weren’t optimal (never hydroplaned, easy to light up the rear wheels) but manageable… god help you if there was snow. They were also worn to 3/32 in 20k miles. Discount Tire has some General Grabber HTS60’s which seem decent, though about $230 more than your most expensive example. If it were my car I’d throw some BFGoodrich Advantage TA Sport LT’s on it, I’m impressed by those.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    Grabber HTS60 +16
    60
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Assurance CS Fuel Max
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online8055

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 80.3 = 76

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 78

    Wet

    Grabber HTS60 +13
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Assurance CS Fuel Max
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8162

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 81.2 = 78

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 65

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 72

    Snow

    Grabber HTS60 +12
    60
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Assurance CS Fuel Max
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7253

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.3 = 72

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS60. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 77

    Comfort

    Grabber HTS60 +20
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Assurance CS Fuel Max
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8151

    Grabber HTS60: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 80.5 = 77

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.1 = 57

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 73

    Noise

    Grabber HTS60 +9
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Assurance CS Fuel Max
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8359

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 83.4 = 73

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 77

    Treadwear

    Grabber HTS60 +13
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Assurance CS Fuel Max
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online8362

    Grabber HTS60: 60% × 73.7 + 40% × 82.9 = 77

    Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber HTS60 +19
    59
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTS60Assurance CS Fuel Max
    Reviews found online7859
Scores at a glance
General Grabber HTS60 vs Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber HTS60Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
Relative Score 76 62
Dry 76 60
Wet 78 65
Snow 72 60
Comfort 77 57
Noise 73 64
Treadwear 77 64
Handling (owners) 78 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber HTS60

± 8

Assurance CS Fuel Max

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber HTS60

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet highway ride quality
  • Great value and affordable price point compared to premium brands
  • Reliable all-season traction in wet, dry, and light winter conditions

Cons

  • Occasional reports of minor road noise or hum at higher speeds
  • Potential manufacturing inconsistencies, such as tires being out-of-round
  • Aggressive tread pattern can occasionally cause slight slippage on loose dirt or debris when taking off
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS60 review

Tire B Assurance CS Fuel Max

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life with many users reporting over 50,000 miles
  • Improved fuel economy
  • Consistent and reliable on-road handling

Cons

  • Higher upfront cost compared to competing options
  • Limited availability at some local retailers
  • Primarily optimized for on-road use rather than off-road or severe weather conditions
All owner themes in the Assurance CS Fuel Max review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber HTS60

Positive

Community opinion of the General Grabber HTS 60 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its low price, quiet road manners, and strong fuel and electric efficiency compared to all-terrain alternatives. While widely praised as an affordable highway tire capable of light towing, some users note concerns regarding winter grip, wet hydroplaning at half tread, and isolated balance or sidewall defect issues.

Top themes
#fuel and EV efficiency#budget-friendly pricing#quiet and smooth ride#highway and road performance#light towing capability#winter and wet traction#treadwear and balance issues

Based on 38 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber HTS60 B · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available392
Rim diameters15″ – 22″17″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 14/32″10 - 11/32″
UTQG620 - 680 A A - B600 A B
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringVertical Serrated Band
Max pressure44 - 80 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber HTS60

Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max

Winner: General Grabber HTS60 — better comfort, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber HTS60 scores 77 vs 57 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber HTS60 scores 78 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber HTS60 scores 76 vs 60 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber HTS60 scores 78 vs 65 on wet.

Tire A · General Grabber HTS60
Tire B · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max?

General Grabber HTS60, 78 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max?

General Grabber HTS60, 76 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max?

General Grabber HTS60, 72 vs 60 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max?

General Grabber HTS60, 73 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 57 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber HTS60 or Assurance CS Fuel Max?

General Grabber HTS60, 77 vs 64 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology