Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber HTS vs Hankook Dynapro AT2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 990 + 218 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber HTS leads, 58–56 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber HTS
Tire AGeneral

Grabber HTS

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 990 reviews

“and wrote a review about them, do a search. they ran extremely strong, cornered well, and screamed like a gurl around the corners. mileage did not seem to be any better than the "N" rated tires, but the price was much better.”

Hankook Dynapro AT2
Tire BHankook

Dynapro AT2

All-Terrain tire

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 218 reviews

“New shoes for the Sunset Truck Hankook Dynapro AT2 Extremes in 30x9.5. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 58

    Dry

    Grabber HTS +2
    56
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTSDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online5350

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 61

    Wet

    Grabber HTS +3
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTSDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5754

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    Dynapro AT2 +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTSDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4955

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 58

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 55.2 = 61

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Grabber HTS +3
    52
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTSDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4845

    Grabber HTS: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 48.2 = 55

    Dynapro AT2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 44.9 = 52

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 62

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTSDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 62

    No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Dynapro AT2 +1
    55
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTSDynapro AT2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online4648

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.3 = 54

    Dynapro AT2: 60% × 60 (est.) + 40% × 48.4 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Dynapro AT2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 54

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber HTS +7
    47
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber HTSDynapro AT2
    Reviews found online5447
Scores at a glance
General Grabber HTS vs Hankook Dynapro AT2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber HTSHankook Dynapro AT2
Relative Score 58 56
Dry 58 56
Wet 61 58
Snow 58 61
Comfort 55 52
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 54 55
Handling (owners) 54 47

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber HTS

± 8

Dynapro AT2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber HTS

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet ride quality that improves vehicle feel
  • Excellent value and affordable price point compared to competitors like Michelin
  • Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Premature tread wear reported by several users failing to reach expected mileage
  • Balancing difficulties and occasional out-of-round vibrations
  • Decreased winter and wet traction performance as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS review

Tire B Dynapro AT2

Pros

  • Comfortable ride quality on asphalt compared to standard summer or previous all-terrain models
  • Good traction and control in dry and wet weather conditions, including dependable trailer towing
  • Favorable fuel economy (MPGs) and low road noise for many users when new

Cons

  • Poor performance and lack of secure handling in snow, ice, and slush at highway speeds
  • Develops significant road noise or drumming as the tread wears down
  • Concerns regarding casing durability, including reports of premature cracking and vulnerability to gravel punctures
All owner themes in the Dynapro AT2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber HTS

Positive

Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.

r/F150Lightning ·3 upvotes ·2023-05-28

“I honestly think the Grabber HTS tires are weak to punctures Just spent $320 at Firestone I was not expecting to pay after only 5400 miles. The stock Grabber HTS tires are supposedly good for up to 50,000 miles IIRC. I barely made it 10% on one of them. This wasn’t the first time the tire picked up a small screw either. First time I got lucky and Discount Tire extracted it without needing repair because it didn’t make it deep into the tread. But last week I wasn’t lucky. Passenger front tire picked up a screw and sure enough, it went in. And it was only about 1.5” from the sidewall so they wouldn’t repair it. I went to Firestone and picked up a Bridgestone Alenza AS Ultra. Not a “great” tire but at least I have a road hazard warranty, something the General Grabber tires don’t have. I’m sure someone will chime in about having zero issues after a million miles with their Grabber HTS but honestly, I haven’t had a legit puncture since 2007 and at that time I was poor so my car always had recycled/used/mismatched tires. I also noticed the tires on my Lightning ALWAYS have gravel and small rocks wedged in between the treads even though the truck is on city streets mainly. I never see that on my other cars.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2011-05-14

“Well , I have them on my 2003 Chevy Silverado 4x4. Put them on at 42k and now at 52k they look like they are 1/2 gone!! Good riding tire , low noise, great in rain and snow ,even wear pattern ,( ran at 39lbs air pressure / 35 psi in winter) but they are gonna be "iffy" for this coming winter by the looks of them.....geeeeesh. I rotated them at 6 k miles too. Nope....I would not buy the HTS Grabbers again. BOB in PA.”

r/tires ·4 upvotes ·2024-12-04

“General Grabbers I found a guy on marketplace who bought some general grabber HTS for his truck and they didn’t fit so he’s selling them. They’re 11/32 tread life and he’ll take $350 for them. They’re my size but I’ve never heard of the brand. I have a 4Runner in Florida so no snow but is this a good deal for that brand? Read more”

Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#highway comfort and noise#wet and dry traction#budget and value#winter and snow capability#towing and load stability

Based on 50 community posts

Tire B

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Mixed

Community sentiment for the Hankook Dynapro AT2 is divided, with frequent distinctions drawn between standard OEM versions and aftermarket or 'Xtreme' models. While drivers appreciate the tire's quiet highway ride, decent fuel economy, and competitive pricing, many criticize the base factory version for poor wet and winter traction as well as lack of genuine off-road capability. In contrast, the Dynapro AT2 Xtreme variant receives widespread praise for improved snow performance, durability, and aggressive styling.

f150gen14.com ·2 upvotes ·2025-10-21

“Factory tires are usually worse than what you normally purchase at a tire shop. Have seen it with every new vehicle. (I get a new work vehicle every 3-4 years) If you look up those Dynapro AT2s, you'll see they even have a different tread pattern for the ones that come with new F-150s vs what is reviewed/shown on Tirerack.com They are cheaper, made for mpg, and don't last. I replaced mine on my 2023 at 20K miles. We noticed the same thing on my wife's VW. Came with some lower-end goodyears that were replaced at 15K. Also, tread-wear warranty only applies to defects. If they wear out sooner, that generally isn't covered by any tire brand.”

f150lightningforum.com ·2025-03-08

“I’ve had the Hankook Dynapro AT2s on another truck and their Dynapro AS on my Expedition. Both were terrible, even dangerous. Got rid of them early on both vehicles. My Lightning came with the General Grabbers. The Grabbers are decent, actually handle snow and wet very well, but are worthless for slush and ice. They’re not good on dirt. But I’ve kept them on now for a bit over 2 years. I’ll be replacing them before next winter as it will be about time anyway. Definitely want to go with something a bit more aggressive or winter-capable, just not sure which tires as of yet. Can’t really afford to sacrifice any range… Maybe just a tiny bit is all.”

f150forum.com

“I had the Hankook AT2 on my 2019 from the factory and they were way better than the Pirelli's that came on my '15 and my '22 F-150 FX4 trucks. They may not be a true AT tire, but they gave me 50,000 miles and functioned well in MN winters as on road tire and did well enough on the small number of off road excursions they took me on while hunting ( half mile to mile dirt trails and across various set-aside agricultural fields).”

Top themes
#poor wet traction#quiet highway ride#OEM vs aftermarket differences#AT2 Xtreme praise#snow and ice performance#fuel efficiency and treadwear#mild off-road capability

Based on 47 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber HTS B · Hankook Dynapro AT2
CategoryAll-Season tireAll-Terrain tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available933
Rim diameters15″ – 20″15″ – 20″
Tread depth11 - 13/32″—
UTQG640 A B440 - 660 A A - B
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 80 psi—
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber HTS

Hankook Dynapro AT2

Narrow edge: General Grabber HTS — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Hankook Dynapro AT2 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber HTS scores 54 vs 47 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber HTS scores 61 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

General Grabber HTS scores 55 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Dynapro AT2 scores 61 vs 58 on snow.

Tire A · General Grabber HTS
Tire B · Hankook Dynapro AT2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber HTS or Dynapro AT2?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber HTS or Dynapro AT2?

General Grabber HTS, 61 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber HTS or Dynapro AT2?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 56 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, Grabber HTS or Dynapro AT2?

Hankook Dynapro AT2, 61 vs 58 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber HTS or Dynapro AT2?

General Grabber HTS, 55 vs 52 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber HTS or Dynapro AT2?

Neither, by our numbers: 54 vs 55 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology