Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 268 reviews
General Grabber UHP vs General Grabber X3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 268 + 119 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber X3 is ahead, 68–63
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Grabber X3 +270Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 68 71 Grabber UHP: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
No road tests of dry for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
67
Wet
Grabber X3 +471Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 71 Grabber UHP: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
No road tests of wet for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
45
Snow
Grabber X3 +2570Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 29 70 Grabber UHP: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 29.1 = 45
Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
No road tests of snow for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
66
Comfort
Grabber UHP +264Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 58 Grabber UHP: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 66
Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Grabber UHP or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Noise
Grabber UHP +561Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 52 Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.2 = 66
Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61
No road tests of noise for Grabber UHP or Grabber X3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
59
Treadwear
Grabber X3 +665Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Grabber X3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 55 65 Grabber UHP: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59
Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
65
Handling (owners)
Grabber UHP +758Why this score
Source Grabber UHP Grabber X3 Reviews found online 65 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber UHP | General Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 63 | 68 |
| Dry | 68 | 70 |
| Wet | 67 | 71 |
| Snow | 45 | 70 |
| Comfort | 66 | 64 |
| Noise | 66 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 59 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 65 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber UHP
Grabber X3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber UHP
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry grip with strong resistance to hydroplaning
- High value for money compared to premium OE brands
- Smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride quality on highways
Cons
- Increased road noise as the tread wears down
- Mixed performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
- Some complaints regarding rapid wear or balancing issues on certain heavy vehicles
Tire B Grabber X3
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
- Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
- Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering
Cons
- Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
- Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
- Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber UHP | B · General Grabber X3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Mud-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 11 | 6 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 24″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 18 - 21/32″ |
| UTQG | 320 - 360 A A | AA A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 35 - 80 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Grabber UHP
General Grabber X3
Winner: General Grabber X3 — better snow, treadwear and wet. Pick the General Grabber UHP if handling and noise matter most to you.
General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 45 on snow.
General Grabber UHP scores 65 vs 58 on handling.
General Grabber X3 scores 65 vs 59 on treadwear.
General Grabber UHP scores 66 vs 61 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber UHP or Grabber X3?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber UHP or Grabber X3?
General Grabber X3, 71 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber UHP or Grabber X3?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Grabber UHP or Grabber X3?
General Grabber X3, 70 vs 45 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Grabber UHP or Grabber X3?
General Grabber UHP, 66 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber UHP or Grabber X3?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 64 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Grabber UHP or Grabber X3?
General Grabber X3, 65 vs 59 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology