tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber UHP vs Michelin Latitude Tour HP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 268 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber UHP is ahead, 62–57

Check price on Amazon · Grabber UHP or Latitude Tour HP on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Grabber UHP +11
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber UHPLatitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6751

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 68

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    No road tests of dry for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Grabber UHP +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber UHPLatitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online6554

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 67

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 58

    No road tests of wet for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 46

    Snow

    Latitude Tour HP +13
    59
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber UHPLatitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online3051

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 57.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.7 = 46

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Grabber UHP +5
    58
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber UHPLatitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6153

    Grabber UHP: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.9 = 63

    Latitude Tour HP: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.4 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber UHPLatitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber UHP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 58

    Treadwear

    Grabber UHP +2
    56
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber UHPLatitude Tour HP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online5250

    Grabber UHP: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.1 = 58

    Latitude Tour HP: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.7 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Latitude Tour HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 63

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber UHP +14
    49
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber UHPLatitude Tour HP
    Reviews found online6349
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber UHPMichelin Latitude Tour HP
Relative Score 62 57
Dry 68 57
Wet 67 58
Snow 46 59
Comfort 63 58
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 58 56
Handling (owners) 63 49

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

Grabber UHP

± 8

Latitude Tour HP

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber UHP

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry grip with strong resistance to hydroplaning
  • High value for money compared to premium OE brands
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable ride quality on highways

Cons

  • Increased road noise as the tread wears down
  • Mixed performance in deep snow or severe winter conditions
  • Some complaints regarding rapid wear or balancing issues on certain heavy vehicles
All owner themes in the Grabber UHP review

Tire B Latitude Tour HP

Pros

  • Excellent ride comfort and low road noise
  • Strong dry-weather handling and steering response
  • High durability and longevity for specific vehicle applications

Cons

  • Premature sidewall cracking and deterioration
  • Inconsistent tread life across different vehicle models
  • Poor traction and predictability in wet or snowy conditions
All owner themes in the Latitude Tour HP review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber UHP B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available117
Rim diameters15″ – 24″16″ – 20″
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG320 - 360 A A400 - 440 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber UHP

Michelin Latitude Tour HP

Winner: General Grabber UHP — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Michelin Latitude Tour HP if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

General Grabber UHP scores 63 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin Latitude Tour HP scores 59 vs 46 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber UHP scores 68 vs 57 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber UHP scores 67 vs 58 on wet.

Tire A · General Grabber UHP
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Latitude Tour HP
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber UHP or Latitude Tour HP?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber UHP or Latitude Tour HP?

General Grabber UHP, 67 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber UHP or Latitude Tour HP?

General Grabber UHP, 68 vs 57 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber UHP or Latitude Tour HP?

Michelin Latitude Tour HP, 59 vs 46 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber UHP or Latitude Tour HP?

General Grabber UHP, 63 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber UHP or Latitude Tour HP?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 56 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology