tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber X3 vs Kumho Crugen HT51 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 119 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

Crugen HT51 leads, 72–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Crugen HT51 or Grabber X3 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber X3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire BKumho

Crugen HT51

All Season

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 164 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Crugen HT51 +3
    73
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online7177

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 71.3 (est.) + 40% × 76.5 = 73

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Crugen HT51 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online7177

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 73.8 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 75

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Level
    70
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7070

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.6 = 70

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Crugen HT51. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Crugen HT51 +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5872

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Crugen HT51 +11
    72
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5278

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 72

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Grabber X3 +1
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Crugen HT51
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)58
    Reviews found online6574

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    Crugen HT51: 60% × 57.7 + 40% × 74.1 = 64

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Crugen HT51 +17
    75
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Crugen HT51
    Reviews found online5875
Scores at a glance
CategoryGeneral Grabber X3Kumho Crugen HT51
Relative Score 68 72
Dry 70 73
Wet 71 75
Snow 70 70
Comfort 64 71
Noise 61 72
Treadwear 65 64
Handling (owners) 58 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber X3

Crugen HT51

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Tire B Crugen HT51

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium competitors
  • Smooth, quiet, and comfortable highway ride
  • Strong dry, wet, and winter/snow traction

Cons

  • Slightly vague or 'squishy' steering feel/sidewall stiffness compared to some OEM tires
  • Potential negative impact on fuel economy (decreased MPG for some truck owners)
  • Occasional reports of accelerated shoulder wear or balancing issues
All owner themes in the Crugen HT51 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber X3 B · Kumho Crugen HT51
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available644
Rim diameters16″ – 18″15″ – 22″
Tread depth18 - 21/32″12.5/32″
UTQGAA A720 A A
Treadwear warranty—70,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure35 - 80 psi50 psi
Sizes in common33

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber X3

Kumho Crugen HT51

Narrow edge: Kumho Crugen HT51 — better handling, noise and comfort. Where the General Grabber X3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 58 on handling.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 72 vs 61 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 71 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 75 vs 71 on wet.

Tire A · General Grabber X3
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Kumho Crugen HT51
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 73 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 72 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51?

Kumho Crugen HT51, 71 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Grabber X3 or Crugen HT51?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 64 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology