Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews
General Grabber X3 vs Nitto Invo — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 119 + 38 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber X3 is ahead, 68–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Grabber X3 +466Why this score
Source Grabber X3 Invo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 65 Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
Invo: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
71
Wet
Grabber X3 +863Why this score
Source Grabber X3 Invo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 71 60 Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
Invo: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 63
No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Snow
Grabber X3 +1951Why this score
Source Grabber X3 Invo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 70 39 Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70
Invo: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 38.5 = 51
No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
64
Comfort
Invo +165Why this score
Source Grabber X3 Invo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 58 62 Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64
Invo: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.6 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3 or Invo. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
61
Noise
Invo +1071Why this score
Source Grabber X3 Invo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 76 Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61
Invo: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 71
No road tests of noise for Grabber X3 or Invo. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Grabber X3 +758Why this score
Source Grabber X3 Invo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 65 53 Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65
Invo: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Invo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Invo +563Why this score
Source Grabber X3 Invo Reviews found online 58 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | General Grabber X3 | Nitto Invo |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 62 |
| Dry | 70 | 66 |
| Wet | 71 | 63 |
| Snow | 70 | 51 |
| Comfort | 64 | 65 |
| Noise | 61 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Grabber X3
Invo
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Grabber X3
Pros
- Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
- Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
- Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering
Cons
- Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
- Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
- Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
Tire B Invo
Pros
- Exceptional initial ride comfort and smoothness
- Very quiet and low road noise when new
- Strong dry traction and cornering grip for spirited driving
Cons
- Dramatically reduced wet and dry grip as the tire wears down
- Rapid tread wear and limited overall longevity
- Develops severe road noise, whining, or harsh vibrations over time
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · General Grabber X3 | B · Nitto Invo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mud-Terrain tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 18 - 21/32″ | 10.3/32″ |
| UTQG | AA A | 220 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Raised Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 35 - 80 psi | 50 psi |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
General Grabber X3
Nitto Invo
Winner: General Grabber X3 — better snow, wet and treadwear. Pick the Nitto Invo if noise matters most to you.
General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 51 on snow.
Nitto Invo scores 71 vs 61 on noise.
General Grabber X3 scores 71 vs 63 on wet.
General Grabber X3 scores 65 vs 58 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Grabber X3 or Invo?
Which is better in the wet, Grabber X3 or Invo?
General Grabber X3, 71 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber X3 or Invo?
General Grabber X3, 70 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Grabber X3 or Invo?
General Grabber X3, 70 vs 51 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Grabber X3 or Invo?
Nitto Invo, 71 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Grabber X3 or Invo?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Grabber X3 or Invo?
General Grabber X3, 65 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology