Head-to-head Updated

General Grabber X3 vs Pirelli Scorpion Zero — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 119 + 483 owner reviews. How we score

Grabber X3 is ahead, 68–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber X3
Tire AGeneral

Grabber X3

Mud-Terrain tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 119 reviews

Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Tire BPirelli

Scorpion Zero

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 483 reviews

“I bought a set of 20” M-wheels when I my X5 was at around 2k miles. I had fitted Pirelli scorpion zero runflats on it. At 65k miles, they had to be replaced due to compound cracking, thread was still at 5 to 6/32. I think they served me well.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Grabber X3 +7
    63
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7160

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Grabber X3 +7
    64
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online7161

    Grabber X3: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 70

    Snow

    Grabber X3 +13
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7048

    Grabber X3: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 70

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 57

    No road tests of snow for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Grabber X3 +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5855

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 58 = 64

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    Scorpion Zero +4
    65
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online5261

    Grabber X3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 51.7 = 61

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 65

    No road tests of noise for Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Grabber X3 +11
    54
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion Zero
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online6545

    Grabber X3: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 65

    Scorpion Zero: 60% × 59.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.3 = 54

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber X3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Grabber X3 +1
    57
    Why this score
    SourceGrabber X3Scorpion Zero
    Reviews found online5857
Scores at a glance
General Grabber X3 vs Pirelli Scorpion Zero: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryGeneral Grabber X3Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Relative Score 68 61
Dry 70 63
Wet 71 64
Snow 70 57
Comfort 64 62
Noise 61 65
Treadwear 65 54
Handling (owners) 58 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Grabber X3

Scorpion Zero

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Grabber X3

Pros

  • Exceptional off-road traction in mud, sand, rocks, and snow
  • Surprisingly quiet on the highway for a mud-terrain tire
  • Aggressive and appealing visual design, including popular red lettering

Cons

  • Initial high-speed handling instability or 'squirminess' reported by some drivers
  • Prone to throwing rocks and debris, potentially chipping paint
  • Occasional reports of rapid or uneven tread wear and cupping
All owner themes in the Grabber X3 review

Tire B Scorpion Zero

Pros

  • Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort
  • Strong dry and wet road handling and stability
  • Good light snow and off-road capability (mud/grass)

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive or high-horsepower drivers
  • Occasional complaints regarding poor wet weather traction or aquaplaning
  • High price point relative to some competitors
All owner themes in the Scorpion Zero review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

General Grabber X3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Pirelli Scorpion Zero

Mixed

Community sentiment regarding the Pirelli Scorpion Zero is mixed, with strong praise for its quiet ride, smooth comfort, and reliable wet and dry traction, especially on newer AS Plus 3 models. However, numerous owners express severe frustration over fast treadwear, with many reporting tires wearing out or balding well under 30,000 miles, alongside complaints regarding unhonored treadwear warranties and issues with the internal PNCS noise-canceling foam.

audiworld.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by MurrayA4 ... Is a very logical conclusion to reach.The spread between "ultra high perf." tires and many "touring" tires has shrunk a great deal.Sounds like the Verde is pretty respectable .Any idea what the UTQG ratings are on those ? I'm lazy ! Pirelli Scorpion Verde A/S 265/40/R21 - 105V (150mph) - UTQG 600AA - 34lbs, 12/32" Tread Depth, 29.3" Diameter Pirelli Scorpion Zero A/S Plus 265/40/R21 - 105Y (186mph) - UTQG 500AA - 33lbs, 10/32" Tread Depth, 29.3 Diameter I think if you tended more towards summer tires and/or lived in a dry-ish climate and could get a good price, the Zero A/S is a good tire. You might only get 30K out of them on a heavy performance SUV but compared to more expensive options the differences seem minimal. Personally, on a truck/SUV I've never experienced a tire rated 600AA have as good performance/stickiness (combined with long treadlife) as the Verdes...”

f150forum.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by Spooled 295/45/20 ST-III's on mine. They work great dry and wet. I can do 60 rolls on 10lbs and they stick. 305/40/22 Pirelli Scorpion Zero Asmmetrico...20 rolls on 15psi and they stick. lol”

r/Rivian ·18 upvotes ·2026-02-16

“Pirelli Scorpion MS vs. Zero I was the unfortunate recipient of a giant screw in my tire last week and had to be towed to a local Discount Tire for a replacement. After being very specific that I wanted the exact same tire that I had (Scorpion MS), they installed the Scorpion Zero on my front right wheel and I just realized it this morning. Is there any damage in keeping this tire if it’s the exact same size? Or should I push back and request they replace it with the tire I have on the three other wheels? Not to mention I’m a little irritated because I feel like it was a sneaky upsell to get me to buy a tire that is $150 more expensive. Thoughts? Read more”

Top themes
#rapid treadwear life#quiet and smooth ride#strong wet traction#PNCS noise-cancelling foam#unhonored mileage warranty#EV tire efficiency

Based on 58 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · General Grabber X3 B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero
CategoryMud-Terrain tireAll-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available649
Rim diameters16″ – 18″18″ – 23″
Tread depth18 - 21/32″—
UTQGAA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Serrated Raised LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure35 - 80 psi—
Sizes in common00

Which one should you actually buy?

General Grabber X3

Pirelli Scorpion Zero

Winner: General Grabber X3 — better snow, treadwear and dry. Pick the Pirelli Scorpion Zero if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 57 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

General Grabber X3 scores 65 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

General Grabber X3 scores 70 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

General Grabber X3 scores 71 vs 64 on wet.

Tire A · General Grabber X3
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero?

Which is better in the wet, Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero?

General Grabber X3, 71 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero?

General Grabber X3, 70 vs 57 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero?

Pirelli Scorpion Zero, 65 vs 61 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Grabber X3 or Scorpion Zero?

General Grabber X3, 65 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology