Tests – · none yet Owners 58 · 16 reviews
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max vs Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 693 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Assurance CS Fuel Max 62, Ventus S1 noble2 61.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 693 reviews
“New shoes: Hankook Ventus S1 Noble2. 255/40-18”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Ventus S1 noble2 +262Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 55 59 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 62.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.9 = 60
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 62
No road tests of dry for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
65
Wet
Ventus S1 noble2 +267Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 66 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 65
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 67
No road tests of wet for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
60
Snow
Assurance CS Fuel Max +753Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 53 41 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 60
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 53
No road tests of snow for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
57
Comfort
Ventus S1 noble2 +764Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 51 62 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 40% × 65.2 (est.) + 60% × 51.1 = 57
Ventus S1 noble2: 40% × 67.3 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64
No road tests of comfort for Assurance CS Fuel Max or Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) – Reviews found online 59 – Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 59.4 = 64
No road tests of noise for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
Assurance CS Fuel Max +1153Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 62 44 Assurance CS Fuel Max: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Ventus S1 noble2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Assurance CS Fuel Max. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus S1 noble2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
59
Handling (owners)
Ventus S1 noble2 +362Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 59 62
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max | Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 61 |
| Dry | 60 | 62 |
| Wet | 65 | 67 |
| Snow | 60 | 53 |
| Comfort | 57 | 64 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 59 | 62 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Assurance CS Fuel Max
Ventus S1 noble2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance CS Fuel Max
Pros
- Exceptional tread life with many users reporting over 50,000 miles
- Improved fuel economy
- Consistent and reliable on-road handling
Cons
- Higher upfront cost compared to competing options
- Limited availability at some local retailers
- Primarily optimized for on-road use rather than off-road or severe weather conditions
Tire B Ventus S1 noble2
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness
- Very low road noise and quiet highway cruising
- Strong dry traction and responsive handling
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, frequently failing to meet mileage expectations
- Poor traction and dangerous handling in snow, slush, and ice
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering response or 'squishy' cornering feel
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its competitive price-to-performance value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Drivers frequently commend its quiet ride, wet grip, and respectable tread life, though some note reduced handling sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires and increased road noise after higher mileage.
“I put Hankook Ventus S1 Noble2 tires on mine and couldn't be any happier. They rate and perform almost identical to the Michelin Pilots for a lot less money. Very high customer reviews too.”
“Originally Posted By: SHOZ I have them on my Genesis Coupe 2L for a year now. Went to 50 series over the OE 45 series. No complaints at all. I ended up going back and ordering them +1 size. OEM is 215/45/17. I went with 225/45/17. They seem to be better suited and less stretched for my application. Ended up costing $410 total for them.”
“I just drove them this week and they are ok. If you are not an aggressive driver and you are looking for longer tread life and an all season they would work fine. If you want better handling in an all season tire I would look at something like the RE970AS. If I can help let me know.”
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max | B · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 8 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A B | 320 - 700 AA - B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
Too close to call: Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max and Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max is stronger on treadwear and snow. Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 is stronger on comfort. Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max scores 64 vs 53 on treadwear.
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max scores 60 vs 53 on snow.
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 64 vs 57 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Assurance CS Fuel Max or Ventus S1 noble2?
Which is better in the wet, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Ventus S1 noble2?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 67 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Ventus S1 noble2?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 62 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Ventus S1 noble2?
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max, 60 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Ventus S1 noble2?
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2, 64 vs 57 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Assurance CS Fuel Max or Ventus S1 noble2?
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max, 64 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology