Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 16 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max vs Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus S1 noble2 leads, 63–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 693 reviews
“I just drove them this week and they are ok. If you are not an aggressive driver and you are looking for longer tread life and an all season they would work fine. If you want better handling in an all season tire I would look at something like the RE970AS. If I can help let me know.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
Ventus S1 noble2 +666Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 56 64 -
65
Wet
Ventus S1 noble2 +368Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 64 68 -
60
Snow
Assurance CS Fuel Max +456Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 53 47 -
61
Comfort
Ventus S1 noble2 +667Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 53 66 -
64
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 59 – -
64
Treadwear
Assurance CS Fuel Max +856Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 63 50 -
59
Handling
Ventus S1 noble2 +564Why this score
Source Assurance CS Fuel Max Ventus S1 noble2 Reviews found online 59 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max | Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 63 |
| Dry | 60 | 66 |
| Wet | 65 | 68 |
| Snow | 60 | 56 |
| Comfort | 61 | 67 |
| Noise | 64 | – |
| Treadwear | 64 | 56 |
| Handling | 59 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Assurance CS Fuel Max
63
/ 100
Ventus S1 noble2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Assurance CS Fuel Max
Pros
- Exceptional tread life with many users reporting over 50,000 miles
- Improved fuel economy
- Consistent and reliable on-road handling
Cons
- Higher upfront cost compared to competing options
- Limited availability at some local retailers
- Primarily optimized for on-road use rather than off-road or severe weather conditions
Tire B Ventus S1 noble2
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness
- Very low road noise and quiet highway cruising
- Strong dry traction and responsive handling
Cons
- Rapid and uneven tread wear, frequently failing to meet mileage expectations
- Poor traction and dangerous handling in snow, slush, and ice
- Soft sidewalls leading to vague steering response or 'squishy' cornering feel
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 is largely positive, with owners highlighting its competitive price-to-performance value compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Drivers frequently commend its quiet ride, wet grip, and respectable tread life, though some note reduced handling sharpness compared to dedicated summer tires and increased road noise after higher mileage.
mbworld.org
“Quote: Originally Posted by MBNUT1 Better ride quality due to taller sidewalls? Physics? Rubbish. This is just a conspiracy by the 18 in wheel manufacturers to remove people's freedom to buy 20 in wheels. I guess my butt isn't as sensitive as some of the guys here of a more "advanced age". But I do know that the ride on these Generals on my 20" stockers is very compliant and quiet, even more so than the 19" winter wheels I just took off the car a couple weeks ago. My old S600 came stock with ugly (IMO) chrome 18" wheels with Michelin Primacy summer tires. I swapped those out to 20" AMG knockoff wheels with Hankook Ventus S1/Noble2 all-season tires and there was no discernible difference in ride comfort. But the handling certainly improved. Those Hankooks were good tires too, but not quite as quiet as the Generals. These big heavy cars are too wallowy around turns as it is, especially with the standard Airmatic. The bigger wheels do sharpen it up a bit.”
r/tires
·59 upvotes ·2023-07-10
“What would you do? Hey y’all. I unluckily ran over a screw very close to the sidewall. Currently have 25k mikes on my OEM set of Hankook Ventus S1 Noble2. I was hoping to get a little more life out of the set. Is it a bad idea to get a single cheap replacement and replace all 4 after some more wear? Thanks!”
bobistheoilguy.com
·2014-07-17
“Originally Posted By: SHOZ I have them on my Genesis Coupe 2L for a year now. Went to 50 series over the OE 45 series. No complaints at all. I ended up going back and ordering them +1 size. OEM is 215/45/17. I went with 225/45/17. They seem to be better suited and less stretched for my application. Ended up costing $410 total for them.”
Top themes
#value and price affordability#quiet and comfortable ride#treadwear and longevity#wet weather traction#all-season vs summer performance#comparison to premium brands
Based on 36 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max | B · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 2 | 8 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 18″ | 17″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 11/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 600 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Vertical Serrated Band | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
63
/ 100
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
Too close to call: Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max and Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max is stronger on treadwear and snow. Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 is stronger on dry, comfort and handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max scores 64 vs 56 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 66 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 67 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 scores 64 vs 59 on handling.
Tire A · Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 noble2
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.