Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 116 reviews
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV vs Michelin CrossClimate+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 116 + 120 owner reviews. How we score
CrossClimate+ is ahead, 82–68
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 81 · 13 tests Owners 78 · 120 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
CrossClimate+ +1987Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 94 Reviews found online 68 77 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 67.9 = 68
CrossClimate+: 60% × 93.9 + 40% × 77.4 = 87
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
CrossClimate+ +981Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 13 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 73 81 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72
CrossClimate+: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 81.2 = 81
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison68Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 65 Reviews found online – 73 CrossClimate+: 60% × 65.1 + 40% × 72.8 = 68
-
65
Comfort
CrossClimate+ +1075Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 64 77 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.6 = 65
CrossClimate+: 40% × 70.9 + 60% × 77.1 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison67Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests – 68 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) CrossClimate+: 60% × 67.6 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67
No owner ratings of noise for CrossClimate+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
64
Treadwear
CrossClimate+ +1882Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 65 (est.) 83 Reviews found online 62 80 Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62 = 64
CrossClimate+: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 79.7 = 82
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
68
Handling (owners)
CrossClimate+ +472Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV CrossClimate+ Reviews found online 68 72 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV CrossClimate+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 82 |
| Dry | 68 | 87 |
| Wet | 72 | 81 |
| Snow | – | 68 |
| Comfort | 65 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 67 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 82 |
| Handling (owners) | 68 | 72 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
CrossClimate+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | CrossClimate+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/7 2016 Autobild 4x4 / SUV Tyre Test | #2/4 2022 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction with strong confidence during heavy rain
- Quiet and smooth ride quality with minimal road noise
- Precise steering response with no tramlining on uneven surfaces
Cons
- High initial cost mentioned by some users
- Potentially faster tread wear depending on driving habits
- Slightly noisy initially until the tires are properly worn in
Tire B CrossClimate+
Pros
- Strong snow and cold-weather traction for an all-season tyre, with many owners reporting winter-tyre-like confidence on snow, slush and hills, including on front-wheel-drive cars.
- Excellent dry handling and steering response with precise, summer-tyre-like feel, along with generally very good wet grip and braking.
- Long tread life: many reports of 30,000–55,000+ km or miles with low wear, including taxi and van use and 4-year/50,000-mile ownership.
Cons
- Performance degradation with age: several owners report grip (wet and snow), noise and ride deteriorating after about 1–2 years, with hardening or cracking of the rubber in some cases.
- Limitations on ice, packed snow and deep or steep snow, where some owners found them inferior to dedicated winter tyres or to rivals such as the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons.
- Wet-weather concerns for some, including aquaplaning, being pulled around by standing water, and scary steering feel as the tyres aged.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV | B · Michelin CrossClimate+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 7 | 63 |
| Rim diameters | 19″ – 21″ | 13″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 240 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 0 | 0 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV
Michelin CrossClimate+
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better dry, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 87 vs 68 on dry.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 82 vs 64 on treadwear.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 65 on comfort.
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 81 vs 72 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or CrossClimate+?
Which is better in the wet, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 81 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 87 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 75 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 SUV or CrossClimate+?
Michelin CrossClimate+, 82 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology