Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 33 road tests and 2,840 + 2,595 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 is ahead, 75–69
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 2 tests Owners 68 · 2,840 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test (wet handling)
“i had some of those i think. they were ok. not great def got some wheel spin with them but i never felt unsafe. lasted a good prob 25-30k miles. i think mine were higher speed rating tho maybe 103 or something like that. for 100/tire not bad.”
Tests 68 · 33 tests Owners 61 · 2,595 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2023 AutoBild UHP Summer Tyre Test (wet handling)
“Pirelli P Zero Tyres But if a rant. Brought my i4 edrive 40 about 14 months ago from a main dealer here in the UK. The front tyres (Hankook) had decent tread, obviously the rears did not, so the dealer swapped them for brand new Pirelli PZero (PZ4) tyres at the rear. Honest to god I have never driven tyres so dam trash in my life. Anything other than a perfect warm dry day, there is little to no grip and car struggles to put its power down. I assume the Zero in P Zero refers to the grip levels. Just wondered if anyone else had any experience with Pirelli’s? Read more”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 30 tests | 75 | 89 |
| Reviews found online | 78 | 72 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 75.2 + 40% × 77.9 = 76
P Zero (PZ4): 60% × 89.1 + 40% × 72.1 = 82
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 31 tests | 81 | 87 |
| Reviews found online | 79 | 69 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 79.3 = 80
P Zero (PZ4): 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 69.1 = 80
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 57 (est.) | – |
| Reviews found online | 35 | – |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 35.1 = 49
No road tests of snow for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 9 tests | 79 | 69 |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 59 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 40% × 78.8 + 60% × 72.7 = 75
P Zero (PZ4): 40% × 68.6 + 60% × 59.2 = 63
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 19 tests | 70 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | 69 | ≈ 67 (est.) |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 69.6 + 40% × 69.3 = 69
P Zero (PZ4): 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 70
No owner ratings of noise for P Zero (PZ4). The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests | ≈ 65 (est.) | 26 |
| Reviews found online | 63 | 40 |
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
P Zero (PZ4): 60% × 25.8 + 40% × 39.7 = 31
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 77 | 70 |
| Source | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / 21 tests | 70 | 29 |
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 69 |
| Dry | 76 | 82 |
| Wet | 80 | 80 |
| Snow | 49 | – |
| Comfort | 75 | 63 |
| Noise | 69 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 31 |
| Handling (owners) | 77 | 70 |
| Efficiency | 70 | 29 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
P Zero (PZ4)
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | P Zero (PZ4) | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #6/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 94% #14/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 99% #6/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling (tester's mark) | Dry | 80% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 64% #5/5 · 2025 AutoView Sports Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 94% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 95% #9/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% #5/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 85% #26/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 99% #3/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling (tester's mark) | Wet | 89% #2/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 97% #2/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 100% #1/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 60% #8/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 98% #7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 97% #4/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 95% #4/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | 85% #4/10 · 2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/8 2019 Auto Motor und Sport UHP Summer Tire Test R20 | #6/7 2025 Moottori EV Summer Tire Test R19 | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
The community generally regards the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 as a high-performing tire that offers great wet weather handling, a comfortable ride, and low noise levels compared to stiffer alternatives like Bridgestone and Continental. Drivers frequently note that these tires transform vehicle handling dynamics, offering a softer yet responsive ride that makes harsh suspensions more manageable. While some users on higher-powered cars experience occasional wheel spin, the overall consensus highlights them as a top-tier choice receiving strong reviews and competitive pricing.
“I've just replaced ContiSport 5's for Goodyear Assy 2 runflats and the Goodyears are so much quieter. Bought the tyres from Costco and paid £600 for 4 x tyres fitted 225 front & 255 rear on 19" rims. One thing I have noticed with the Goodyears is that the ride is much softer, so for the first time in 3 years of ownership when selecting Sport suspension [M sport adaptive suspension] the ride is fun. Previously the ride was too hard with Sport suspension selected. The Goodyears handle speed humps so much better than the Contis did.”
“Quote: Originally Posted by TodmordenLad That's a very good price. I paid £642 for 4 mixed 19 RFTs incl delivery from Camskill and then paid a BMW dealer £120 incl VAT to fit them - didn't want my local indie to mark the rims, which he did once before.. Yes, that price of £122 back in September was very good. There have been some well priced Goodyears F1's on Amazon recently, with keeping a watch fro your size.”
Based on 22 community posts
Community sentiment regarding the Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) is largely critical, with users reporting extremely rapid tread wear and severe grip issues outside of warm, dry conditions. While some drivers consider them for OEM run-flat availability, multiple posts highlight concerns over poor longevity and lackluster wet and cold weather performance compared to competitors like Michelin.
Based on 7 community posts
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 | B · Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 33 | 193 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 21″ | 17″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 240 - 300 AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 31 | 31 |
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2
Pirelli P Zero (PZ4)
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 — better efficiency, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Pirelli P Zero (PZ4) if dry matters most to you.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 70 vs 29 on efficiency.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 64 vs 31 on treadwear.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 75 vs 63 on comfort.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2 scores 77 vs 70 on handling.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 80 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Pirelli P Zero (PZ4), 82 vs 76 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 70 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 75 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 64 vs 31 on our treadwear score.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 2, 70 vs 29 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
